sickle_s.gif (30476 bytes) People's Democracy

(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist)

Vol. XXV

No. 05

February 04, 2001


Declaration Of President's Rule In UP

Could Have Saved The Masjid

Deposing on January 29 before the Liberhan Commission of Inquiry into the sequence of events leading to the demolition of the Babri Masjid, Jyoti Basu, as reported by the national newspapers, squarely blamed the Narsimha Rao government for failure to take steps to prevent the demolition of the Babri Masjid. Stating that two days before the event, he had warned the prime minister of the impending attack, Basu expressed the view that the demolition of the Masjid could have been avoided if only the central government had declared president's rule in Uttar Pradesh before the congregation of 'kar sevaks' in Ayodha in December 1992. There was no way to pre-empt the December 6 developments, other than the removal of the then BJP government in UP. After the restoration of peace, the government could have been handed over to the BJP again.

Jyoti Basu is due to again appear before the Commission sometime in March.

We give below the statement of Jyoti Basu made before Justice Liberhan.

" I AM happy that I have been given the opportunity to appear before the Commission.

I wish to make a few points on the demolition of the Babri Masjid and reply to any queries.

  1. There were reports that the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya may be attacked by the Kar Sevaks. The then prime minister Sri Narsimha Rao, convened the meeting of the National Integration Council on November 23, 1992. On behalf of the CPI(M), Harkishan Singh Surjeet, the general secretary, and I attended the meeting. No member of the BJP attended it. Unanimously, powers were given to Sri Narsimha Rao to take necessary measures to protect the Masjid. On our party's behalf we proposed that even Article 356 of the Constitution may be used if there is no other way to protect it, though we have been opposing its use.
  2. Two days before the demolition, i.e., on December 4, 1992, I rang up the prime minister to inform him that there was apprehension that the Masjid may be attacked and hence something has to be done to protect it. The prime minister said the working committee of the Congress was to meet on the issue. But your lordship knows what happened.
  3. After the UP government was dismissed later, Sri Kalyan Singh addressed a meeting in Calcutta on February 2, 1993, as recorded by the police. The Hindi speech, along with the English translation, is also with me. I shall leave these with you. I particularly draw your attention to that part of the speech in which he speaks about the demolition of the mosque. "I express before you, I did not have any repentance, nor any pangs or agony for the case, and I had a pleasure to declare it as a historic day. I can tell you, my dear friends, without the inspiration of God such a colossal job of demolition could not have been pulled off within five hours without using any explosive device. Even if we engaged a labour contractor for the same, the contractor might have taken at least one and half months time for the said purpose, including removal of huge amount of debris. You know, the birth of new Indian era will take place with some glorious future after December 6, 1992. The demolition of the structure (though some sections of people took it for a shame for the Nation) has become an affair of pride to the Nation."
  4. In the third week of December, 1993, Surjeet and I met the prime minister and asked him why nothing was done. He said, "How could I disbelieve a chief minister when he assured me that no harm will be done to the Masjid." I then presented the cassette to him and told him what I told you now. I do not know whether he heard the cassette.
  5. The present prime minister, Sri Vajpayee, met me on March 20, 1999, in Calcutta and asked me why I called the BJP barbaric and uncivilised. I said I do not normally name anybody, but I do call the demolition a barbaric act, and I asked him how did it happen and what language should I use. He said "It was an accident and not organised". I told him about Kalyan Singh's speech. He kept quiet. Now he is saying something else - "expression of national sentiment" (Bhavna)

We shall await the findings of the Commission."

2001_j1.jpg (1443 bytes)