People's Democracy
(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
|
Vol. XXV No. 05
February 04, 2001 |
Declaration Of President's Rule
In UP
Could Have Saved The Masjid
Deposing on January 29 before the
Liberhan Commission of Inquiry into the sequence of events leading to the demolition of
the Babri Masjid, Jyoti Basu, as reported by the national newspapers, squarely blamed the
Narsimha Rao government for failure to take steps to prevent the demolition of the Babri
Masjid. Stating that two days before the event, he had warned the prime minister of the
impending attack, Basu expressed the view that the demolition of the Masjid could have
been avoided if only the central government had declared president's rule in Uttar Pradesh
before the congregation of 'kar sevaks' in Ayodha in December 1992. There was no way to
pre-empt the December 6 developments, other than the removal of the then BJP government in
UP. After the restoration of peace, the government could have been handed over to the BJP
again.
Jyoti Basu is due to again appear before
the Commission sometime in March.
We give below the statement of Jyoti
Basu made before Justice Liberhan.
" I AM happy that I have been given
the opportunity to appear before the Commission.
I wish to make a few points on the
demolition of the Babri Masjid and reply to any queries.
- There were reports that the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya may
be attacked by the Kar Sevaks. The then prime minister Sri Narsimha Rao, convened the
meeting of the National Integration Council on November 23, 1992. On behalf of the CPI(M),
Harkishan Singh Surjeet, the general secretary, and I attended the meeting. No member of
the BJP attended it. Unanimously, powers were given to Sri Narsimha Rao to take necessary
measures to protect the Masjid. On our party's behalf we proposed that even Article 356 of
the Constitution may be used if there is no other way to protect it, though we have been
opposing its use.
- Two days before the demolition, i.e., on December 4,
1992, I rang up the prime minister to inform him that there was apprehension that the
Masjid may be attacked and hence something has to be done to protect it. The prime
minister said the working committee of the Congress was to meet on the issue. But your
lordship knows what happened.
- After the UP government was dismissed later, Sri Kalyan
Singh addressed a meeting in Calcutta on February 2, 1993, as recorded by the police. The
Hindi speech, along with the English translation, is also with me. I shall leave these
with you. I particularly draw your attention to that part of the speech in which he speaks
about the demolition of the mosque. "I express before you, I did not have any
repentance, nor any pangs or agony for the case, and I had a pleasure to declare it as a
historic day. I can tell you, my dear friends, without the inspiration of God such a
colossal job of demolition could not have been pulled off within five hours without using
any explosive device. Even if we engaged a labour contractor for the same, the contractor
might have taken at least one and half months time for the said purpose, including removal
of huge amount of debris. You know, the birth of new Indian era will take place with some
glorious future after December 6, 1992. The demolition of the structure (though some
sections of people took it for a shame for the Nation) has become an affair of pride to
the Nation."
- In the third week of December, 1993, Surjeet and I met
the prime minister and asked him why nothing was done. He said, "How could I
disbelieve a chief minister when he assured me that no harm will be done to the
Masjid." I then presented the cassette to him and told him what I told you now. I
do not know whether he heard the cassette.
- The present prime minister, Sri Vajpayee, met me on March
20, 1999, in Calcutta and asked me why I called the BJP barbaric and uncivilised. I said I
do not normally name anybody, but I do call the demolition a barbaric act, and I asked him
how did it happen and what language should I use. He said "It was an accident and
not organised". I told him about Kalyan Singh's speech. He kept quiet. Now he is
saying something else - "expression of national sentiment" (Bhavna)
We shall await the findings of the
Commission."