People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol.
XXVII No. 09 March 02, 2003 |
Savarkar Affair: The Message Is Clear
WITH
fascist
brazenness,
the
Vajpayee
government
has
gone
ahead
and
unveiled
a
portrait
of
V
D
Savarkar
in
the
Central
Hall
of
the
Parliament.
While
the
entire
opposition
boycotted
this
ceremony
in
protest,
the
drumbeaters
of
the
BJP
in
the
NDA
acquiesced
shamelessly.
Apart
from
the
very
weighty
and
sound
reasons
as
to
why
a
Savarkar
portrait
should
not
adorn
the
Central
Hall
of
the
Parliament,
the
singular
message
that
the
RSS-BJP
seeks
to
convey
cannot
be
missed.
By
placing
this
portrait
right
opposite
that
of
Mahatma
Gandhi,
the
RSS/BJP
is
seeking
to
redefine
the
paradigm
of
Indian
nationalism.
While
Gandhi
stood
for
Indian
nationalism
devoid
of
any
religious
denomination,
Savarkar
aggressively
propagated
Hindu
nationalism.
The
attempt
to
equate
Hindu
nationalism
alone
with
Indian
nationalism
is
the
backbone
of
the
ideological
project
that
seeks
to
metamorphose
the
secular
democratic
Indian
Republic
into
a
fascistic
"Hindu
Rashtra".
That
such
an
event
could
be
possible
only
55
years
after
India's
independence
is
a
telling
point.
Once
controlling
the
reins
of
State
power,
the
RSS/BJP
spare
no
efforts
to
systematically
demolish
the
foundations
and
structures
of
secular
democracy
in
order
to
facilitate
the
fascistic
transformation
of
India.
Savarkar,
it
must
be
recollected,
was
the
first
person
who
propounded
the
two-nation
theory.
This
was
two
years
before
Mohd.
Ali
Jinnah
and
Muslim
League
advanced
this
notion
which
eventually
led
to
the
partition
of
the
country
and
the
consequent
bloodshed,
miseries
and
insecurity
that
continue
to
plague
us
till
today.
Savarkar
had
also
coined
the
slogan
of
Hindutva
way
back
in
1923.
In
doing
so,
he
clearly
states
that
Hindutva
cannot
be
seen
as
being
synonymous
with
Hindu
religion.
Clearly,
this
was
a
political
slogan
aimed
at
misutilising
the
religious
sentiments
of
the
people
for
capturing
political
power.
Even
some
well-meaning
people
today
are
engaged
in
a
facile
debate
on
seeking
to
define
the
right
type
of
Hindutva:
Vivekananda's
Hindutva
or
the
RSS's
Hindutva.
There
are
no
two
or
many
Hindutvas.
A
political
slogan
can
neither
be
open
to
interpretation
nor
subjected
to
different
expressions.
There
is
only
one
propounded
by
Savarkar
which
has
little
to
do
with
Hindu
religion
itself.
The
enormous
damage
that
this
political
ideological
formulation
of
Hindutva
is
doing
to
our
country's
body
politic
is
there
for
all
to
see.
Worse
is
the
fact
that
Savarkar
shamelessly
sought
mercy
from
the
British
and
on
this
basis
was
released
from
the
Andamans.
Elsewhere
in
this
issue,
the
relevant
portions
of
his
letter
to
the
British
are
reproduced.
This
was
a
time
when
hundreds
of
Indian
patriots
were
languishing
in
the
cellular
jail
in
the
Andamans
refusing
to
seek
pardon
or
mercy
from
the
British
colonialists.
The
contrast
with
Bhagat
Singh
cannot
but
bring
out
the
character
of
Savarkar
more
sharply.
Bhagat
Singh's
father
had
written
to
the
British
seeking
mercy
for
his
son.
Bhagat
Singh
promptly
admonished
his
father
and
told
the
British
that
no
Indian
patriot
can
ever
seek
mercy
from
those
very
forces
against
whom
he
was
struggling
for
India's
freedom.
It
is
a
portrait
of
such
a
person
which
now
adorns
the
Central
Hall
of
the
Parliament!
Reports
now
indicate
that
the
Vajpayee
government
had
earlier
approached
the
then
President
K
R
Narayanan
with
a
suggestion
that
Savarkar
be
awarded
the
Bharat
Ratna
posthumously.
The
fact
that
this
proposal
has
not
been
implemented
till
date
suggests
the
role
that
the
President
of
India
can
play
in
such
matters.
In
contrast,
despite
the
urging
by
the
entire
opposition,
President
Kalam
went
by
the
government's
bidding.
It
will,
indeed,
be
unfortunate,
if
not
tragic,
that
the
apprehensions
made
by
the
Left
during
the
course
of
the
presidential
elections
proved
to
be
true.