People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol.
XXVII
No. 17 April 27, 2003 |
B Prashant
ON
April 19 afternoon, CPI(M) state secretary Anil Biswas answered a wide range of
questions on the forthcoming panchayat elections in Bengal at a 'Meet the Press'
programme held at the Press Club in Kolkata. Biswas said
the process of rural development greatly dependens on the three-tier
panchayat system, and that it would be the aim of the Left Front to accelerate
the pace of rural development and ensure a greater level of mass participation
in the running of the panchayats.
Biswas
said there are three alliances in the fray this year for the panchayat polls.
These are: the Left Front; the Pradesh Congress and its allies; and the Trinamul
Congress-BJP alliance. In its election manifesto, the Pradesh Congress has
spoken against any 'grand alliance' (mahajot)
with the Trinamul Congress. However, the Pradesh Congress leadership, including
the state president Pranab Mukherjee, has freely admitted elsewhere how such an
alliance has already come into existence in a great many panchayat areas. On the
other hand, the Trinamul Congress leader, Mamata Banerjee has spoken about a mahajot
with the Pradesh Congress in about a dozen places while the joint manifesto of
the BJP and the Trinamul Congress would not officially mention the possibility
of such an occurrence. The CPI(M) leader expressed hope that the electorate
would carefully scrutinise the election manifestoes of the three contesting
fronts, listen to whatever they have to say, and finally cast their votes on the
basis of their experiences at the ground level.
About
the political background of the panchayat elections, Biswas said Bengal has been
one of the very few states where the panchayat elections have been held in time,
ever since the Left Front government assumed office back in 1977. The panchayat
polls have always been a political struggle for us. In 1978, the slogan of the
Left Front for the rural polls was: “Do away with vested interests in the
villages.” In 1983, the slogan was: “Ensure that the vested interests do not
re-emerge, extend democratic rights further, and accelerate the pace of
development.” In 1988, the slogan was: “Consolidate and strengthen the
grass-roots level democracy in the rural areas.” In 1998, with the formation
of an alliance of the Congress, the BJP and the Jharkhand party, the slogan was:
“Defeat the forces of communalism and reaction and consolidate the positive
changes in the countryside.” The Left Front seeks a coordinated development of
the panchayat system this time around. The CPI(M) state secretary said the
people would judge us on the basis of their own experience. He had no doubt that
the Left Front would do even better than it had done back in 1998.
On
the opposition parties’ complaints about
the pre-poll scenario, Biswas said the opposition Pradesh Congress, Trinamul
Congress and the BJP have not been able to put up candidates in many places. In
fact, in most of these instances, the opposition combines find it next to
impossible to find men and women who are willing to be put up as candidates. To
take but a single case, those who ran on the Trinamul Congress ticket for the
Panchayat Samity and Gram Panchayat seats in Khanakul have turned extremely
reluctant to do so this time. Kashinath Mishra, the Trinamul Congress leader
from Bankura district, has gone on record saying that no one appeared to be keen
this year to be put up as a candidate for the Trinamul Congress, and that there
was no case of coercion involved at any stage.
Biswas
said the CPI(M) fully believes in the dignity of the opposition in a democratic
system. However, we can hardly be blamed if the opposition is not able to put up
candidates for the rural polls. When the opposition speak of ‘terror,’ one
really should recall that hitherto it has been the Left Front that has suffered
and no less than six of its workers have been murdered. The parties of the
opposition should also pause and think about the kind of political terror that
exists in the states where they are in office. In Bengal, the law and order
situation is much better than that prevailing in the country in general. Biswas
had no doubt that the workers of the Left movement would continue to make
sacrifices to ensure that the democratic environment of the state is never
disturbed.
The
correlation of class forces changes constantly in a class-divided society,
Biswas said. In a situation where political development is uneven, there is no
comprehensive change in the correlation of class forces. Over the past 25 years,
the democratic rights and the dignity of the mass of the common people in urban
and rural areas have been established on a firm basis. In the villages, the
people themselves participate in the decision-making process in order to choose
their own developmental programmes. The struggle to change the correlation of
class forces in favour of social progress goes on relentlessly.
As
for corruption in the panchayats, the corrupting influence of power is a real
problem. However, Biswas reminded,
the political character of a party depends on how far it is able and willing to
carry on a strident struggle against corruption. The CPI(M) in the state has
expelled no less than 309 party members on various charges including those of
corruption. The list includes
elected members at the level of the Zilla Parishad. The party never compromised
in the task of fighting corruption. The people of the state know it very well
that one or two workers of the CPI(M) or the Left Front might have strayed, but
that our programme does not support corruption and that we never brook any
compromises while carrying on our fight against all corrupt ways. (INN)