People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol.
XXVII
No. 18 May 04, 2003 |
ON
April 24, in a historic and inspiring gathering at the Mavalankar Hall grounds,
New Delhi, thousands of women from 19 states, mainly poor rural women, redefined
the concept of women’s “empowerment” and advance, asserting that policies
that ignored the needs and concerns of poor women were a farce and a mockery.
The Sangharsh Sabha organised
by the All India Democratic Women’s Association (AIDWA) highlighted the
crucial linkages between food deprivation and declining status of rural women as
experienced by the mass of rural women and expressed in numerous struggles for
food and work in the last several months under the banner of the AIDWA. The
organisers had expected around three thousand women to attend but, when the call
was given in the villages, large numbers of women expressed their desire to
attend the Sabha and make their voices heard. The participants, around 8000,
were agricultural workers, landless women, Dalits, Adivasis, and a substantial
number of poor Muslim women.
MILITANT
ASSERTION
Thus
the Sabha was also a militant assertion of women’s unity at a time when that
unity is sought to be disrupted in the name of religion. Several groups of women
were felicitated for their courageous struggles and when these women came on the
stage --- some who had fought land struggles, some who had been in jail for
defying the police, some who had gheraoed and broken the locks of FCI godowns
--- they were cheered and applauded by the thousands of women present. The main
speakers at the Sabha were women who had directly experienced the brunt of the
government’s callous and criminal food policy. It was a rare experience to
listen to the militancy and articulation of the speakers.
Later
the Sangharsh Sabha converted itself into a militant rally at Parliament Street
where thousands of women blocked the road in an expression of their anger. A 15
member delegation from several states met the union minister for food, Sharad
Yadav, and gave him a memorandum.
The
Sabha, presided over by AIDWA president Subhashini Ali, was also attended by
representatives of several organisations of women, other fraternal organisations,
intellectuals and economists who expressed their solidarity with the women
gathered. Another expression of solidarity came through the collection of
foodgrains, vegetables, sugar, tea leaves, cannisters of oil, etc, from workers
in Delhi that enabled the organisers to feed the thousands of women
at highly subsidised rates.
Harkishan
Singh Surjeet, general secretary of the CPI(M), opened the Sabha with his
introductory remarks. Food, he said, was a central issue and it was imperative
that all citizens have access to it through a strengthened public distribution
system (PDS). Remarking on the presence of poor women, he said that it was their
direct experience that was being reflected in the Sabha. He strongly criticised
the central government for its policies creating hunger.
IRONY
OF
The
Sangharsh Sabha, with a focus on the demand for a New Food Policy:
Low Priced Foodgrains and Work For All, was a culmination of
campaigns and activities conducted over the last 6 months. The activists who
spoke in the course of the day’s proceedings were drawn from the thousands who
had participated in these campaigns, to focus on what is emerging as a crucial
issue for the survival of the people in view of the current scenario of
liberalisation and the adoption of the so-called economic reforms in India.
Brinda Karat, general secretary of the AIDWA, succinctly put this across while presenting the main issues of the declaration cum resolution that was adopted by the Sabha. Karat pointed to the irony of the situation, drawing attention to the promised paradise by the forces of Hindutva and the reality of the lives of the women as it emerges from the testimonies of the vast mass of rural and urban poor, from amongst whom the participants of the Sangharsh Sabha were drawn. The most glaring aspects of this were:
Karat
drew attention to the large-scale seasonal migration of women labourers and the
vulnerability of these women to exploitation at different levels. These include
a most negative impact on the health of women since they eat last and least, an
increase in violence because of their increased dependence and subordination to
the rural rich at distress levels, and harder work at less wages. In fact this
is the way the labour reform has already been implemented in vast parts of rural
India. Referring to the 73rd and 74th amendments passed exactly 10 years ago,
she observed that though the reservation in elected bodies was a landmark step,
poor women in rural India were unable to take advantage of this benefit because
of their preoccupation with strategies for sheer survival in view of the state
abdicating its responsibility.
VOICES
OF
Speakers
at the Sabha highlighted the problems faced by women in the regions they came
from. Sandhya Deb Burman from Tripura drew attention to the
difficulties faced by women in an area affected
by terrorism. On the one hand, women from the tribal areas have to withstand the
ravages of terrorist activity; on the other, the political regime at the centre
pays no heed to their problem. At times women walk miles to go to the ration
shop, with possibility of terrorists snatching away their cards on the way,
apart from making other threats. Meanwhile the state does not receive the
requisite supply of foodgrains from the central quota, so that those who have
BPL cards do not get the essential items, while many amongst the tribals do not
even have a card.
Mehjabeen
from Gujarat, who
spent several months in the Shah Alam Camp, narrated how in the camps they were
fed grain which was not fit to be consumed even by animals. The state-sponsored
carnage had resulted in the loss of livelihood, and the earning capacity of the
minority community was drastically reduced. Many of the families affected by the
carnage had lost their ration cards but now the government was causing
difficulties and refusing to give them fresh cards. They were deprived therefore
of all government schemes.
Gomti
Shakya and Paramjeet from Ganganagar (Rajasthan)
lived in a district adjacent to the border. Here the Indian army laid out
landmines in preparation for a war, making it impossible to carry on
cultivation. Summing up how developments on the border in recent years affected
the ordinary people she remarked: Na ladai hui, na log mare na log jiye. Kisi
ki banh kati, kisi ki laat, mahinon bhukhmari jhelni pari (there was no war;
nobody died nor was anyone resurrected; someone lost an arm and someone a leg;
we had to face hunger for months.)
Women
from 32 villages, including hers, protested outside the collector’s office;
only then did they allot some grains for their area; and that too went to the
sarpanch’s house. So the women had to again struggle and finally gherao the
guy to get it distributed. Coming from an Adivasi belt, she pointed out that
they had no card, no pension, none for widows either, and theirs was a life of
struggle all the way.
Dr
Abhijeet Sen, chairperson
of the governmental committee set up to fix the agricultural prices, extended
warm greetings to the participants. He drew attention to the fact that while the
committee looked into various aspects of the PDS, some of its recommendations
were in accord with the demands being expressed in the Sabha.
·
Sen spoke
firmly in favour of a universal PDS. Do Teen Kism ke Cards Logon Ko Baant
Dete Hain. The division gets extended to health, education and all other
amenities.
·
The Committee
agreed on extension and expansion of the Antyodaya scheme to a larger group of
people.
·
Every family
below the BPL should be given 60 days work or free rations or be included into
the Antyodaya scheme.
·
Antyodaya be
delinked from the income criterion and be extended to all those falling in the
category of the deprived sections.
Laxmibai
from Andhra Pradesh pointed out that there was a huge increase in poverty in her region.
Rice was now available for more than Rs 5 per kg as against
Rs 2 a kg earlier and the quantity given per person was only 4 kg.
Few women were covered by Antyodaya, and even fewer families headed by
women. In the wake of increasing unemployment and poverty, there were reports
from the district of Anantapur of wives being mortgaged and daughters being
sold. Others were denied a minimum wage. Also present on the dais were Ratnamala
and Padma who
broke the lock of a godown in the course of the campaign to get the foodgrains
distributed.
The
Sangharsh Sabha gave a call to intensify the struggle at all level it extended
full support to the May 21 all-India strike called by trade unions and called on
women to organise rasta rokos and gheraos of FCI godowns and
central government offices, to add the two main demands for a new food policy
(see detailed demands in box) and for the passage of the Women’s Reservation
Bill.