People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol.
XXVII
No. 45 November 09, 2003 |
RELEVANCE
OF THE GREAT OCTOBER REVOLUTION
Harkishan Singh Surjeet
THE
success of the Great October Revolution in 1917 was the first scientific
attestation of the correctness of Marxist-Leninist theory. A doctrine till then,
it required the strength of the revolution led by the Bolshevik Party to
disprove its critics and establish before the world the validity of the theory
of scientific socialism.
Karl
Marx and Frederick Engels, initiators and the finest exponents of scientific
socialism, outlined the course that the history of human development would
follow --- from capitalism to socialism and then to communism. While the general
direction and the forces that would bring about this change were known, the
concrete ways and means to achieve it were to vary from country to country,
depending both on the international situation and the objective situation in any
given country.
A
NEW COURSE CHARTED OUT
Lenin
said in 1917:
"We
do not claim that Marx knew or Marxists know the road to socialism down to the
last detail. It would be nonsense to claim anything of the kind. What we know is
the direction of this road, and the class forces that follow it; the specific,
practical details will come to light only through the experience of the millions
when they take things into their own hands."
Lenin
had also pointed out that
"The
Marxian doctrine arose away from the high road of development of world
civilisation. On the contrary, the genius of Marx consists precisely in his
having furnished answers to questions already raised by the foremost minds of
mankind. His doctrine emerged as the direct and immediate continuation of the
teachings of the greatest representatives of philosophy, political economy and
socialism.”
Making
his unique contribution to enriching the Marxist doctrine, Lenin analysed
imperialism as the highest stage of capitalism. Evaluating the revolution in the
imperialist stage, Lenin concluded that the socialist revolution could succeed
not only in capitalist countries but even in a relatively backward country where
the imperialist chain is the weakest.
It
was this understanding of the new period and the concrete application of the
theory to the concrete conditions prevailing in Russia, that enabled the
Bolshevik Party under Lenin to successfully carry out the revolution. The
revolution succeeded on October 25, 1917 (as per the old Russian calendar), and
therefore it is more popularly known as the October revolution.
REVOLUTION’S
CONTRIBUTIONS
The
first decrees that the socialist state promulgated were on peace and land. The
party headed by Lenin was thus able to realise the task of rallying the
peasantry behind the working class in defence of the revolution. The strength
thus gained saw the infant socialist state successfully withstand and thwart the
imperialist intervention and put down the civil war.
The
success of the this revolution concretely demonstrates that we can end class
rule and the different forms of exploitation that characterise it and create a
form of society in which everyone contributes to production according to ability
and receives payment according to his or her work. This is a step forward
towards a society in which everyone contributes to production according to his
or her ability and receives the return according to his or her needs.
It
is this concept which gave rise to so many institutions we find even in class
society today, especially the idea of the welfare state. The creation of free
schools, colleges and universities as part of the process of bringing about free
and compulsory education and the goal of the elimination of illiteracy owe its
spread in our times to the lessons learned from the Soviet Russia.
In
the more than seven decades of its existence, the Soviet Union was able to
provide its citizens hitherto unheard of rights and guarantees. The right to
work, to education, to health, to shelter and the innumerable other rights and
privileges that the people of the first socialist state enjoyed undoubtedly
influenced the peoples in other countries. The inspiration that this provided to
the struggles for better living conditions in other countries, compelled the
capitalists in these countries to give some concessions to the underprivileged
in their countries and thus arose the concept of the "welfare state."
The
emergence of economic planning as a response to both market anarchy as well as
the takeover of the market by monopolies that extract super profits from the
consumer leaving him no other alternative, is also something we owe to this
revolution. In the same way, the elimination of unemployment as a result of the
evolution of socialist economic planning to meet the needs of people and not to
extract the maximum profit from them, owes its origin to the Russian revolution.
Institutions
like free public healthcare, state owned industry, cooperatives, old age
pension, old people’s homes and broad-based local government institutions like
those of Panchayati Raj, that unite different sections of the workers and
peasants all over the world, all owe their birth to the success of this
revolution. It is because of this success that they were implemented on a large
scale in many countries. Otherwise, they would have been no more than
experiments conducted by small groups and the like.
For
us, the revolution created new opportunities for global cooperation in contrast
to the global competition of monopolies and empires. This opened up the door to
a world without colonies and a world without wars. The treaty of Brest Litovsk
after the Russian revolution helped bring World War I to an end. And without the
active resistance of the Soviet Union that defeated 75 per cent of Hitler’s
forces on its soil, World War II could not have been won nor fascism defeated.
Since the end of that war, it was the presence of the Soviet Union that
prevented the outbreak of World War III, and the signing of treaties like SALT I
and SALT II were a move to end the nuclear menace. In 1985, the USSR
unilaterally announced the end of nuclear testing.
IMPETUS
TO LIBERATION PROCESS
For
us in India, it was the impetus the Soviet Union gave to national liberation
movements that affected us most. Before the emergence of the Soviet Union as a
force to reckon with, colonies, even if they overthrew one colonial power, were
parceled out to others. The Arabs who successfully fought the Ottoman Empire
during World War I found themselves parceled between the British and the French,
and were forced to fight for their independence again. The present struggle for
an independent Palestinian state is a part of that unfinished anti-imperialist
agenda, now further complicated by the US occupation of Iraq and its support to
the Zionist state of Israel.
An
essential feature linked to the success of the Russian revolution is the end of
colonial rule in over 60 states and the spurt of national liberation movements
that emerged after World War II. Small countries like Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos,
the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea and Cuba were able to counter the
stranglehold not only of the defeated axis powers like Germany, Italy and Japan,
but also of the victorious allies like Britain, France and the USA.
This
momentous event inspired the working class movement the world over and
strengthened the anti-colonial struggle. It is the emergence of the socialist
state and the formation of the USSR that liberated the various suppressed and
oppressed nationalities that inhabited the prison house of the Czar.
The
whole world is compelled to acknowledge the role the Soviet Union played in
shaping contemporary history.
ESSENTIALS
OF THE THEORY
The
Russian revolution was the first successful application of the theory of Marx
and Engels to the concrete conditions of a state. The success of this revolution
had a massive impact on the consciousness of revolutionary movements all over
the world, notably in China, Vietnam, the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea,
and Cuba. After World War II a number of East European states like Poland, East
Germany, Yugoslavia, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Romania and Bulgaria, formed a
powerful socialist bloc, which tilted the balance of forces in the world to the
advantage of socialism. It is true they were unable to last out the struggle
against imperialist penetration of the socialist camp. Obviously, mistakes were
committed. But mistakes do not negate the correctness of the scientific theory
that we know today as dialectical and historical materialism.
Its
essential feature is that all forms of matter and the relations that come into
being around them are subject to change. There are opposing forces of growth and
decay in them that work themselves out by coming up as contradictions that must
be resolved with the element of the decaying being overthrown by the new,
creating a new contradiction in its time to be resolved.
In
the sphere of society it is the forces of production based on the new
developments in the material world and the labour of human beings, with
technological development and skills as the instrument, that create new
conditions. At the same time they divide society into different classes that
struggle with each other to appropriate this production. This fact of
appropriation leads to class struggle and to revolutionary changes.
History
is the process through which, based on the constant development of the forces of
production, new relations of exploitation and classes linked to them, come into
being and are overthrown in keeping with the necessities of development. In this
process we observe the emergence of more and more efficient forms of technology
and skills as also of struggle. This continues through four major stages of
development of society: slavery, feudalism, capitalism and communism. The
transition to socialism, characterised by the dictatorship of the proletariat,
comes with the overthrow of the dictatorship of capital. This process unwinds
itself with the overthrow of the capitalist class by the working class, which
finally appropriates the means of production. The class has produced wealth for
others over centuries. Once the master of its production, it puts an end to
exploitation and to the related class struggle.
With
this an era of planned production to meet the needs of humanity is launched. And
its success has been the success not only of Soviet Russia, but also of
socialist China, Cuba and other socialist states in achieving growth of material
production and all round development, including human development, which far
richer capitalist states have neither achieved nor wish to provide their people
with. The USA, the sole superpower in existence today, prefers to seek resources
and places for investment outside its territory rather than provide its people
better education, health and infrastructural facilities. It prefers to invest in
and profit from the arms race and the destruction it breeds rather than invest
in production that strengthens a higher standard of living for all of humanity
in a climate of peace and progress. In this lie the seeds of its downfall.
The
greatest contribution of the October revolution was that it was a practical
demonstration that a single state in the hands of the working class can create
conditions that can transform the situation in the world qualitatively. It is
the existence of the Soviet Union that ensured that the process of
decolonisation could come into its own after World War II. Indeed, it was
because of it that newly independent countries could acquire advanced technology
which imperialist states were unwilling to give them. The same goes for the
concept of the welfare state and the institutions to ensure world peace.
AN
IMMORTAL REVOLUTION
The
existence of the Soviet Union, its success in development and its role in the
world exposed the idea that war was necessary to develop one’s country. On the
contrary, it was counter-productive and destructive. In fact, the first
declaration of the Soviet Union in the sphere of international relations was its
decree on peace, announcing that a new era of international relations had begun.
The
most important thing, however, that the Russian revolution contributed to our
understanding of history was that there are no “chosen people” in the world
and it is the task of all people everywhere to organise forces at home and in
solidarity with others to further the progress towards classless society. To
ensure success in this, the Russian revolution directs us to study our concrete
conditions in relation to changing world developments and organise conscious
action to further the cause of the working class taking control of the means of
production on a global level.
Today,
while the Soviet Union has ceased to exist, one cannot wish away its
contributions. They made a worldwide and significant impact and therefore will
remain etched in memory.
The
unfortunate events that led to restoration of capitalism in the former socialist
countries of East Europe and the Soviet Union’s disintegration were due to the
distortions and deviations that had crept in the application of Marxism-Leninism
to the concrete prevailing conditions, to the serious errors and mistakes
committed during socialist construction. An erroneous understanding crept in and
realities on the ground were sought to be ignored. While rightly paying
attention to achieving parity in weaponry to meet any imperialist challenge,
equal emphasis on industrial development was lagging and proper attention was
not paid to the immense advances made in the field of science and technology.
While these issues in the realm of economy were ignored, the task of ensuring
the people’s participation in decision making bodies and making these truly
representative in character was given a go by. No distinction was drawn between
the party and the state, and the principles of democratic centralism were
increasingly violated with more emphasis on centralism. The leadership came to
replace the party and a coterie replaced the leadership. These shortcomings,
errors and mistakes contributed to the setbacks and reverses.
Whereas
capitalism had an experience of over 300 years, socialism was a new concept.
While it had tremendous achievements to its credit, it was the negative factors
in its application that finally led to the disintegration of the Soviet Union
and the setbacks in the East European countries.
REGROUPING
CONTINUES
But
faced with hunger, poverty and destitution that form the quintessence of a
system of exploitation, with the reality of capitalism staring in their faces,
the peoples of the countries of East Europe and the various republics that
formed the Soviet Union are now fighting back. The regimes in these countries
are facing mounting resistance. Parties that had surrendered in face of the
concerted imperialist onslaught are regrouping to take on the new challenges.
People are once again reposing faith in communist parties. In Russia today, the
Communist Party of Russian Federation is the biggest organised force.
In
the countries of existing socialism like China, Cuba, Vietnam, Laos and DPR
Korea, the ruling parties are drawing lessons from the past mistakes and
undertaking adequate and appropriate changes there deem fit in their respective
objective conditions. Now it is universally recognised that there can be no
single model for building socialism. Each country has to choose its own path,
taking into consideration the objective conditions existing in each country, the
level of development of productive forces and the correlation of class forces.
The Chinese example has made a further contribution about socialist construction
in a less developed country. While adhering to the fundamental principles, the
Chinese emphasise on developing the productive forces. But three principles are
common for the victory of socialism --- leadership of the communist party,
worker-peasant alliance, and the dictatorship of the proletariat. Taking
into consideration the experience of these countries, while everybody bases on
the science of Marxism-Leninism for achieving success, they also adapt it to
local conditions. While the Chinese term it Mao Zedong thought-Deng Xiaoping
theory, the Koreans call it the Juche idea, the Vietnamese identify it with Ho
Chi Minh, and others identify with their own models or concrete conditions.
The
massive propaganda that accompanied the cataclysmic events of 1991, proclaiming
the demise of socialism and the death of communism, no longer cuts any ice.
People in the former Soviet republics and East European countries are realising
that capitalism is no answer. In these countries there is growing disparities,
increasing unemployment, insecurity and destitution.
The
imperialist dream of subverting the socialist systems in other countries,
however, did not succeed. One fourth of humanity continues to live in these
socialist countries --- China, Vietnam, Cuba, Korea and Laos. These were some of
the most backward economies. Cuba, lying just 90 miles off the US coast, is
defiantly and valiantly defeating all attempts at destabilisation. The
imperialist imposed blockade imposed great difficulties on the Cuban people and
the infant socialist state. But despite their own difficulties, the Cubans have
rendered enormous help to various liberation movements. The influence of their
revolution has spread to the entire Latin America and the Caribbean.
Marxism-Leninism
continues to remain valid. History has proved its validity and relevance. The
ferocity of the attack by anti-communists and reactionaries fail to invalidate
the continuing significance of the path-breaking event, i e the Great October
Revolution and the establishment of the first socialist state.
The
CPI(M)’s paper presented at the International Seminar on “Contemporary World
Situation and the Validity of Marxism” in 1992 aptly said:
"The
validity of Marxism as a science, a method, a guide to action and its abiding
relevance is justified by the nature of the present world developments.
The entire quest of Marx during this lifetime and that of all subsequent
Marxists, was to establish the basic factors necessary for complete human
liberation. Capitalism, as Marx had shown and subsequent developments justify,
is a system based on human exploitation. As long as exploitation of man by man
and of nation by nation continues to be the basis of the capitalist system, the
yearning for human liberation can never be snuffed out. The world that we know
today, the rights that humanity has come to accept as a matter of course, had
all been contributions of people's struggles. It is this class struggle that
continues to shape the present day developments and its associated human
consciousness. The imprint of Marxism on contemporary society and the
intellectual development of humanity is inerasable.
“The
contemporary world situation tellingly demonstrate the unjust and inhuman nature
of capitalism. It is its rapacious plunder that is responsible for the terrible
situation of hunger, misery, sickness, illiteracy that stalk the millions in the
developing world. It is directly responsible for the dangers of nuclear
holocaust and worsening major ecological imbalances. The increasing moral and
ethical degeneration of capitalist societies, drug abuse, violence, gender and
racial discrimination are continuously debasing the finer qualities of human
beings. Despite the perennial propaganda, intensified following these reverses
to socialism, that `capitalism is eternal,’ it today, as in the past, proves
itself as a system incapable of solving the major problems confronting
humanity.”
As
opposed to this
"Marxism-Leninism
is inherently materialistic, creative and intrinsically dialectical. It is hence
supremely anti-dogmatic. It is a world-view that embraces the vision of
liberation and expresses emancipatory ideals. It is a tool for understanding and
analysing the multitude of phenomena that constitute changing historical
situations. It is a guide to action that defines programmatic objectives for the
people's struggle for liberation, subject to the necessary adaptations as
required by changing historical situations" (Resolution on Certain Ideological Issues, adopted by the 14th CPI(M)
Congress, 1992).