People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol.
XXVII
No. 50 December 14, 2003 |
EDITORIAL
THE
conduct of the former Chattisgarh chief minister, Ajit Jogi, is indeed
reprehensible. Instead of accepting the people’s verdict and the Congress
defeat gracefully, Jogi indulged in seeking to bribe and entice sections of the
BJP MLAs in order to form an alternative government. The Congress party has
rightly taken action against Jogi for having entered into such machinations and
extending, in writing, to the Governor, Congress’s support to a splinter BJP
group.
In
a classic case of the pot calling the kettle black, the BJP mounted a moral high
platform in attacking the Congress on this score. The alacrity with which the
CBI has filed the First Information Report (FIR) has confirmed, if ever such a
reconfirmation is necessary, that the CBI functions at the behest of the PMO and
the home ministry. So far no case has been registered or an FIR filed against
Judev who was caught on camera accepting wads of cash. Not very strangely, for
all these years no FIRs have been registered against those BJP or NDA leaders
who were seen by millions accepting wads of cash as bribe in the Tehelka
episode. Instead, the enquiry into this episode was directed more at
ascertaining how such sting operations were conducted, in order to intimidate
and persecute those who have made such exposures in the public interest. This
has serious implications for the exercise of the right to information and the
freedom of expression for the society in general and the media in particular. As
pointed out by journalistically inclined legal minds that the sacrosanct right
of the media to protect its sources can be prised open by such moves.
Likewise
in the Judev episode the probe is to concentrate on who/how the sting operation
was conducted. However, in a sting operation personally cleared by the deputy
prime minister/home minister and personally carried out by the union law
minister, Vajpayee’s CBI moves in promptly!
Condemnable as they are, such acts of
bribing elected representatives in order to form governments have now become a
benchmark of political immorality amongst the ruling class parties. It is indeed
ironic that the BJP is adopting a moral high position when many of its
governments in various states at various points of time were formed and survived
precisely through such machinations. It is the BJP that had made a norm of
offering ministries to all defected MLAs in UP. The splitting of the BSP,
Congress, Lok Dal, Janata Dal etc for the continuation of the then BJP chief
minister, Kalyan Singh, has not been forgotten in public memory. Or, for that
matter, its government in Goa today has come into being precisely through such
immoral moves.
Indeed,
it needs to be reminded that Vajpayee’s swearing in as the prime minister, in
the first place in 1998, was possible only through such and other unethical
manoeuvres. The whole country was witness to various deals being struck so that
letters of support could be sent to the President of India. The lady in Chennai
had actually kept Vajpayee waiting for nearly 72 hours!
Sordid
as they are, such universalisation of sleaze and corruption to establish
political immorality as a norm of democratic functioning is indeed ominous. This
strikes at the very roots of parliamentary democracy and makes a mockery of the
people’s verdict in any democratic elections. If moneybags alone are to decide
where elected representatives would sit and whom they would support then all
principles of any political campaign or people’s decision reflected in their
voting on the basis of principles and politics are nullified.
In
order to restore people’s faith in the necessity and efficacy of this
parliamentary system, it is necessary that proper action should be taken against
all those who have been exposed in such grave acts of commission.
This however does not appear possible given the fact that those involved
in the Tehelka episode continue to reign as ministers and Vajpayee and company
appear to have no compunctions about this. In such a situation, it is only a
popular people’s pressure that can force the ruling classes and their cohorts
to take action and punish the guilty in such a manner which can prevent if not
prohibit the recurrence of such episodes.