People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol.
XXVII
No. 52 December 28, 2003 |
UGC’S
MODEL ACT FOR 21ST CENTURY UNIVERSITIES IN INDIA
Commercialisation
of Higher Education --- II
IN
view of “the ongoing globalisation in the higher education sector, the
steady reduction in government funding of the universities, and the
increasing influence of ICT on education,” a generalised university of
the 21st century in the country has to “perform multiple functions.” In
addition to the already existing traditional functions, the Model Act,
applicable to all the types of universities in the country, would include “the
mobilisation of financial resources to become self-sufficient” as one
of its objects and would have statutory provisions for raising resources
through:
Sponsored
R&D projects funded, apart from government agencies, by industries and
companies,
Consultancy
and testing services for “industries, companies and other institutions in
India/abroad,
Preparing
the outgoing students for national/state level competitive
examinations, interviews, entrepreneurship, new careers and other
opportunities, and
Creation
and preparation of educational/research material like text/reference books,
audio/video tapes/cassettes, floppies/CDs.
Further,
“for financial and physical resources generation/mobilisation from various
sources, like central/state governments, non-governmental organisations,
international funding agencies, philanthropists and other donors,” the
universities would be allowed to set up a “company or registered
society,” and associate and collaborate “with the private sector.”
Thus the Vision and Strategy of the UGC, in times to come, is not only
that the universities should respond to the market needs, but that the
universities should become a part of the market and private sector by setting up
companies and registered societies for revenue generation. The
fundamental task of the universities to assimilate, create and disseminate
knowledge is of least priority for the Vision and Strategy of the UGC.
In
the wake of “diminishing financial support from the government,” lot
of emphasis has been put, in the Concept Paper and the questionnaire, on revenue
generation and financial self-sufficiency. Therefore, one of the main functions
of the vice chancellor would be “mobilising financial and other resources.”
In order to help the vice chancellor, an additional post of pro-vice chancellor,
a senior academic with knowledge or experience of business or finance, would be
created to take charge of resource generation and related aspects. There would
be provisions for constituting various boards for distance education,
publication, sponsored research, consultancy, etc, that would help raise funds.
In a market-model university, departments that make money, study money or
attract money are given priority. Heads of universities and institutions of
higher education --- the vice chancellors, directors, principals --- will now be
assuming the role of travelling salesmen to promote their programmes.
In
the Model Act, common for all the universities, emphasis would be on
“distance education for the society at large, which would be provided using
audio/video broadcasts and/or ICT and related new technologies as against
the earlier correspondence courses, now becoming obsolete.” The main
slogan of private and business universities the world over --- “any time,
any where, any discipline learning for any one” --- has been made the
central slogan for the distance education programmes of the universities in
India. Following the practices of business universities, students would be
allowed to take courses of their choice from many universities at a time with
the facility of inter-institutional students’ mobility by mutual credits
transfer, and degree/diploma would be awarded jointly by universities in
partnership. For this purpose “statewide/countrywide virtual classrooms
would be set up.” The distance education, described by the Concept Paper as a
commercial activity, would be one of the sources of revenue generation. However,
the marginalised and disadvantaged sections of the society who opt for the
correspondence courses would be kept out of this stream as well. Only those
sections who can pay the fees for profit making courses and have access to
electronic media and the internet would be able to enrol in these courses.
Ambani
and Birla had recommended to the prime minister in April 2000 that legislation
should be enacted “banning any form of political activity on campuses of
universities and educational institutions.” Responding to the requirement
of these businessmen and since the universities are proposed to be the part of
market and private sector, the new Act would have statutory provision
“for maintaining campus peace and harmony” and good public relations with
respect to all its constituents, like students, faculty, staff, alumni, parents,
funding agencies, press/media, government, UGC and the society at large. For
peace and harmony, even the normal trade union activities will not be allowed.
This is clear from the questionnaire wherein responses have been invited on
“depoliticisation of the campus for a healthy academic environment.”
There
may be some flexibility “to maintain some variation in the University Acts
to facilitate regional emphasis.” The Concept Paper is “against curtailing
the power and position of the chancellors (governors of states at present ---
Author).” In the new Act, the president of India or the governor of
the state would discharge the constitutional responsibilities relating to the
central/state university as visitor and they would have “powers of
discretion and judgment” in various functions relating to the university,
including the appointment
of the chancellor and vice chancellor and their duties and responsibilities, and
deciding appeals, petitions, representations, etc. In order to facilitate
networked learning centres distributed all over the country and even abroad, the
jurisdiction of the universities will not be relevant any more. The executive
(management) council, the highest authority with powers to frame
statutes/ordinances/regulations would have only ex-officio and nominated
members, and the provisions of elected representatives on this body would be
withdrawn.
There
are five points that emerge from the exercise of formulating the Model Act,
common for all the universities, which show the intention of the central
government and UGC:
They
want to completely withdraw from the funding of the universities, colleges
and institutions of higher educations.
They
want the universities and institutions of higher education to prepare
themselves to be part of globalisation and face the consequences in the
event of India becoming part of general agreement on trade in services
(GATS) and throws open its higher education sector to the transnational
providers of education for profit making.
Therefore,
they want that the universities and institutions of higher education should
not be dependent on the funding from the government and its agencies.
That
is why they are trying to make an Act with the provisions by which
the universities and institutions of higher education in India can do and
become part of the business.
As
a result, a vast majority of students who come from the disadvantaged and
weaker sections and the lower middle class would be excluded from the
benefits of higher education because these sections cannot bear the
exorbitant cost of education.
HOW
STAKEHOLDERS HAVE TO RESPOND
In order to create an environment for these purposes, the government and UGC have been working overtime for the last several years by reducing state funding of and limiting access to higher education, heavy cost recovery, loans to students, terming higher education as a non-merit good, assessment and accreditation of institutions, autonomous status to colleges, self-financing courses and institutions, increased workload of teachers and non-teaching employees, contractual appointments and privatisation and commercialisation of higher education, etc. If the Model Act is allowed to be adopted an orderly development of higher education in India in the 21st century shall not take place. No longer will truth be sought through education, except whatever suits the corporate interests.
Therefore,
the first need is not to respond to the questionnaire attached to
the Concept Paper. Rather a detailed critique of and opposition to the
government policy of privatisation and commercialisation of higher education
under the dictates of the World Bank, WTO and GATS should be the response of
teachers, students, parents and all stakeholders in higher education. As
the citizens of India, we have to ensure that the government takes care of
public interests and act to protect public services like health and education
from the predatory elements that preach the ideology of the marketplace as the
solution to every issue. The attempt to introduce a Model Act is a
desperate attempt of the BJP-led NDA government towards all round
commercialisation of higher education in the country. In order to fail this
attempt of the government, no one can afford to be complacent. It is the
responsibility of the whole society to rise to the occasion and take measures so
that the process of dismantling the higher education system in the country is
reversed.
(Concluded)