People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol.
XXIX
No. 06 February 06, 2005 |
“Carry
Forward Heroic Telangana Struggle’s Legacy”
THE
national leaders of the CPI(M) have called upon the party cadre in Andhra
Pradesh to further carry forward the heroic legacy of the Telangana armed
struggle, underlining the need to redouble the efforts in that direction.
They
were addressing a massive public meeting in Warangal on the concluding day of
the CPI(M)’s 18th Andhra Pradesh state conference. The entire town was
drenched in red – red banners, red flags, red shirt volunteers and so on.
Hundreds of thousands from all parts of the state thronged Comrade Mallu Venkata
Narsimha Reddy Nagar (A J Mill Grounds) for the rally. With the re-elected state
secretary B V Raghavulu and CPI((M) Central Committee member Thammineni
Veerabadhram and Warangal district secretary G Nagaiah in the forefront, a
massive procession of red shirt volunteers and people marched through the
thoroughfares of the town to the public meeting venue. Another huge procession
also converged at the meeting venue even as Party national leaders had begun
their speeches.
Among
those who addressed the public meeting, which was presided over by G Nagaiah,
were CPI(M) general secretary Harkishan Singh Surjeet, Polit Bureau member and
West Bengal state chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee, Polit Bureau members
Sitaran Yechury and Koratala Satyanarayana, CPI(M) state secretary B V Raghavulu,
Central Committee member and Telangana struggle’s heroine Mallu Swarajyam,
Central Committee members Thammineni Veerabadhram and Paturi Ramaiah, state
secretariat member M A Gafoor and others.
Addressing
the rally, Surjeet recalled the unparalleled leadership provided by leaders such
as P Sundarayya and M Basavapunniah to the Telangana armed struggle and how it
inspired the communists across the nation, including himself. He said it was not
only because of such a great legacy but also due to the continuation of
struggles by the Party in the state that it had earned for itself a special
place in the polity. Reminding that the land issue was brought to the centre-stage
with the Telangana struggle, he called upon the party cadre to continue that
glorious tradition in the coming period.
Referring
to the current political situation at the centre, Surjeet said that the UPA
government was not in a position to continue in power without the support of the
Left parties. Saying that this support of the Left was solely based on the
Common Minimum Programme, Surjeet warned that if the government deviated from
the CMP and continued the anti-people policies of the Vajpayee government the
party would unleash a nationwide movement. He said ever since its formation, the
party waged struggles on the issues of land, food and employment and that it
would intensify these struggles.
Buddhadeb
Bhattacharjee told the huge gathering that Bengal unit of the party learnt a lot
from the struggles waged by the Andhra Party. He said that the land issue thrown
up by the Telangana armed struggle was taken to a successful conclusion by the
Bengal Left Front which undertook massive land reforms programme. Today, more
than 72 per cent of arable land in the state is owned by small and marginal
farmers. This was possible because the Left Front government broke the landlords
back by implementing land reforms. It had stipulated that no one can own more
than 12 acres of arable land or 17 acres of non-arable land in the state. The
land in excess of this ceiling was seized by the government and distributed
among the poor, particularly those belonging to the scheduled castes and
scheduled tribes. The LF government put in place decentralised local government
bodies much before the bourgeois parties began speaking of devolving powers to
the local bodies, resulting in the existence of real democracy at the grassroots
level. He traced the 27 year long uninterrupted rule of the LF in the state to
the implementation of such policies. However, the Left Front was not content
with just this much and that much more needed to be done. But since in the
existing set-up, it was not possible for just a state government to go ahead and
implement socialism, the state government was devising alternative policies
within the limitations. These policies have brought down poverty in the state
from 60 per cent to 26 per cent. He noted with satisfaction that the Left Front
had been able to successfully thwart the designs of the communal forces in the
state.
Buddhadeb
referred to the Maoists attempts to create problems in Bengal and said that the
state government was not only dealing it at the law and order level but also
socio-politically. He said though Mao was a great leader, in the end he had
committed mistakes, among which was the one to encourage Naxalism in our
country.
Sitaram
Yechury in his speech said that all those who had written off communists were
today forced to acknowledge the growing clout of the Left in the nation’s
affairs with the role played by the party. Referring to the separatist demands
of Telangana state, Yechury called upon the people to see through the lust for
power behind this demand. He contrasted this with the communists who genuinely
fought for the development of Telangana by making immense sacrifices. Yechury
asserted that real development of backward regions in the state would be
possible only through maintaining united Andhra Pradesh. He said efforts were on
both at the state and national level to further develop the unity of the Left
forces through united struggles. Efforts for ideological unity were also going
on, he stated. He said the CPI(M) was making serious efforts to see that people
get relief with the implementation of pro-people commitments made in the CMP.
And for this, the party would not hesitate to unleash mass movements, he said.
B
V Raghavulu in his speech called upon all the Left parties in the state to come
onto a platform to fight for the interests of the downtrodden classes and defeat
the bourgeois parties. He suggested to the Maoists to reconsider their ideology
and leave the individual annihilation path and join people’s struggles. He
characterised the eight months long Y S Rajashekar Reddy government rule as
lackluster and continuation of the Chandrababu Naidu policies. He lambasted the
Telangana Rashtra Samithi (TRS) for doing nothing for the development of
Telangana despite sharing power in the state and the centre. This confirmed the
fears that they were merely interested in the spoils of office. Referring to the
overtures being made by the TDP towards the Left, Raghavulu asserted that so
long as the TDP continued its friendship with the World Bank and the BJP there
was no question of any alliance with it. He criticised both the state government
and the Maoists for not making efforts to continue the second round of peace
talks. Real peace was possible only when both the parties discussed people’s
agenda.