People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol.
XXIX
No. 13 March 27, 2005 |
PAKISTAN
DIARY-III
Naresh
‘Nadeem’
OUR
short stay at Islamabad was no less pleasant even though everyone was tired
after the road journey from Lahore to Islamabad. The weather was pleasant. In
fact, the constant impression since we had landed at Lahore was that the weather
we were encountering was quite good --- natural weather as well as political.
MARCH 1
The
night before, we were told that Pakistan prime minister, Shri Shaukat Aziz, had
invited the delegation to meet him at 10.30 a m. In the morning, however, the
news came that there was a change in the programme. Now, we were to meet the
president, General Pervez Musharraf, at the same time.
There
were some other changes, too. Soon came the news that the president would meet
only the delegation
leaders,
Surjeet and Bardhan. Another change was that he would meet the leaders not in
Aiwan-e-Sadr (President’s House) in Islamabad but at the General Headquarters
in Pindi. Finally, the meeting took place not at 10.30 but only after 12, when
we all had reached the Foreign Office.
Honestly
speaking, so many changes baffled me. What could the reason be, I tried to
fathom. Was it necessitated by security concerns? There were, after all, three
attacks on the president last year!
The
delegation leaders’ meeting with the president created a big sensation
throughout Pakistan, and the media covered it prominently. Rather, it was the
lead item in most of the Pakistani papers.
As
the only Urdu speaking persons in the delegation, Shamim Faizee’s and my job
was to scan the Urdu papers, and we scrupulously did this informally assigned
job. What miffed us was that, contrary to English press, Urdu papers had by and
large ignored the delegation. Sometimes a small news in one corner, sometimes
nothing. But they too were constrained to take note of the leaders’ meeting
the president.
Going
by comments in Urdu papers, I could not avoid the feeling that Urdu press was as
if trying hard to persuade itself not to take note of the delegation.
As
our readers already have details of this meeting, we skip it here.
From
Rawalpindi, Surjeet and Bardhan directly came to the Foreign Office where we
were all waiting for them. A posse of media persons, including some Indian
journalists, was also there. The lunch hosted by foreign minister, Shri Khurshid
Mahmood Qasoori, proceeded in a very cordial atmosphere. Leaders of the Muslim
League (Qaid-e-Azam) and Mahajir Qaumi Movement, constituents of the ruling
combine, also attended.
Here
we met Dr Farooq Sattar, leader of the 18-member MQM group in National Assembly.
(His forefathers were from Gujarat in India.) He was excessively keen that after
reaching Karachi the delegation should take out time to meet a group of MQM
leaders. One may note that the MQM has its base mainly in Sindh, with Karachi
having the biggest concentration of mahajirs
(migrants).
The
evening was devoted to a visit to Gurdwara Panja Sahib at Hasan Abdal in Attock
district and to Taxila that falls in Rawalpindi district. None of these visits
was in our itinerary and we did not have visa for Attock district either. CPP
general secretary Qazi Imdad, its leader Jameel Malik and his family members
accompanied in separate cars. It was quite dark when we reached Taxila from
Hasan Abdal (where the government maintains the gurdwara and some local Muslims
look after it). Moreover, having no prior information about our arrival,
concerned officials had closed the Taxila Museum. This was a pity as, contrary
to communal propaganda, the Pakistan government has preserved a very large
number of relics of the Buddhist period.
The
loss was somewhat made up by our visit to Sirkap. It was a flourishing town in
ancient days and is about 5 km from the present Taxila town. Here, well
preserved in situ, one may see the
ruins of a more than two millennia old and planned town, about 5 km in length
and one km in width. However, in view of the darkness all around we were advised
against going to the hillock, not very far from Sirkap, where an Ashokan
inscription still stands.
The
hectic tour ended with our arrival at the dinner that was hosted by Shri
Raghavan, India’s deputy high commissioner in Islamabad, at his house. I had
already met Raghavan and his wife, Ranjana Sengupta, in Lahore, and we had
discovered with pleasant surprise that we were students at JNU in the same
period.
While
still at Lahore, we had tried our best that the three meetings in Islamabad
(with president, prime minister and foreign minister) must be compressed in one
single day, March 1. Several missives were sent to Islamabad for the purpose.
The idea was that in that case we could proceed to Karachi on March 1 evening,
or March 2 morning at the most, and stay there for two days. But this was not to
be. The bureaucracy had its own way.
So,
when the leaders went to meet the prime minister in the forenoon, we found
ourselves without work, so to say. Though it was the first substantial break in
a hectic programme since February 24, it was nothing pleasant to us. We spent
the morning with groups of comrades from various places, whose number had
increased as it was our last day in Islamabad. Several came down to the airport
to see us off.
We
also spent a few hours to go to Daman-e-Koh, a place of exceptional beauty.
Developed atop the Marghala Hills, from here you can see the whole of Islamabad
that is situated only on one side of this hill. I counted the high-rise
buildings of Islamabad --- only eight. Felt good to a person who was fed up with
the view of Delhi skyscrapers.
And
then, in the afternoon, over to Karachi by plane.
The
Jinnah Airport of Karachi was witness to another crowded reception to the
CPI(M)-CPI delegation. Here the JLF had arranged our boarding and lodging. There
was no specific programme in the evening, except loitering.
The
leaders spent some time meeting a group of PPP, JUI and NAP leaders in the Sindh
Assembly building. The Jamiatul-Ulema-e-Islami (JUI) was formed after the
country’s partition, out of the Jamiatul-Ulema-e-Hind that played a notable
role in the independence movement. It represented the section which some
historians have called “nationalist Muslims,” a misnomer. The National Awami
Party (NAP) is led by a grandson of Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan.
Finally,
Dr Farooq Sattar had what he wanted. A group of MQM leaders were there in the
group that met the CPI(M) and CPI leaders.
One
of the important personalities who came to meet Surjeet and Bardhan was Captain
Zafarullah Poshni, the only survivor among the accused of the infamous
Rawalpindi conspiracy case of early 1950s. One will recall that the then Liaqat
government had framed this case to crush the communist movement in the country.
Bardhan
also met Ms Ghanwa Bhutto, widow of Murtaza Bhutto and leader of the anti-Benazir
faction in the PPP. She was not invited to the programme in the Sindh Assembly
building. An overtired Surjeet could not go to meet her.
The
evening saw a crowded mass meeting in the lawn of Karachi Press Club. It was
organised by the JLF and Karachi Union of Journalists.
The
last meeting of the day --- and during our stay in Pakistan --- was the one in
the auditorium of Pakistan Medical Association, Garden Road. It was organised by
Progressive Writers Association (PWA) in collaboration with two local level
organisations. These are Karwan-e-Amn (Heralds of Peace) and Qalam Barae-Amn
(pen for peace). The former is a group of Catholic clergymen who run several
schools, hospitals, etc, in the country. Among these, the St Patrick’s High
School (established 1861) has the distinction of producing several luminaries of
Pakistan.
It
was quite apt that veteran Sindhi writer Shobho Gyanchandani (95), one of the
PWA’s founders in this part of the undivided country, presided over this
function. PWA general secretary Muslim Shamim conducted the meeting where
Bardhan was the chief guest. Not feeling well, Surjeet could not attend.
After
the welcome address by Reverend Father Joseph Pal of Karwan-e-Amn, Urdu poet G M
Felix ‘Qaasir’ Amritsari referred to the recent arrest of six Catholic
fishermen in Gwadar, pleading that Surjeet and Bardhan must do something to get
them released. It was evident that the news of release of a number of youth from
Indian Punjab and Indian fishermen, after Surjeet and Bardhan had taken up the
issue with the Pakistan president, had caught public imagination all over the
country. Since our return from Pakistan, a number of Punjabi youth and fishermen
have been released after completing the technical formalities; Punjab chief
minister Captain Amrinder Singh also brought back with him a group of 26 youth
after their release from jail. But who can deny that it was the CPI(M)-CPI
delegation that had taken up the matter with President Musharraf!
We
left Karachi for Delhi on March 4 morning, regretting that these seven days had
passed too soon.
The
CPI(M)-CPI team visited Pakistan when we are in the midst of Sajjad Zaheer birth
centenary celebrations. One recalls that late Comrade Sajjad Zaheer, the moving
spirit behind the PWA, was also the first general secretary of Communist Party
of Pakistan and the main accused in the Rawalpindi conspiracy case.
(Concluded)