People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol.
XXIX
No. 20 May 15, 2005 |
The
Communist Party of India (Marxist) has submitted a note outlining its stand on
the question of the formation of a separate Telangana. This has been submitted
by Party general secretary, Prakash Karat on May 5 in response to a request from
Pranab Mukherjee, chairman of the group appointed by the UPA coordination
committee to consider the demand for the formation of a Telangana state.
Following
is the full text of the note:
The
formation of Andhra Pradesh was the result of a sustained movement for the
creation of a unified linguistic state for all the Telugu-speaking people.
The Vishalandhra movement was actually demanding the fulfillment of a
promise made during the freedom struggle that the provinces of India would
be reorganised on a linguistic basis. The Indian National Congress first
accorded recognition to this principle by reorganising the Pradesh
Provincial Committees of the Congress party on a linguistic basis as early
as 1921 at the Nagpur session.
The
creation of linguistic states undid the legacy of colonial rule which set up
multi-lingual provinces purely for the administrative purposes of the
British rulers. The States Reorganisation Committee explicitly recognised
the linguistic principle for the formation of states. The formation of
Andhra Pradesh in 1956 was followed by the setting up of states like Kerala,
Karnataka, Maharashtra, Gujarat and so forth. Thus, one of the major steps
for democratising the Indian State system was undertaken. Restructuring the
states on linguistic lines was an essential step for expanding democracy
since it enabled people to have an administration and educational set-up in
their own language. Within such a state adequate safeguards for linguistic
minorities was to be provided.
The
formation of linguistic states provided the bedrock for the federal system
in our country. The states thus formed have developed and contributed to the
federal polity and the democratic political system. Dividing these states
into smaller states will weaken the federal principle. Small states emerging
out of the division of the linguistically homogenous states will be more
dependent on the centre and this will militate against the federal
principle. The CPI(M) has always held that we need both a strong centre and
strong states to strengthen national unity.
Uneven
development and regional backwardness within states have grown since
independence. The nature of capitalist development is such where capital and
resources flow into developed areas and where infrastructure exists. This
aggravates the problem of regional disparities. Such problems exist
irrespective of the size and locations of states.
Telangana
is a region which has been historically underdeveloped and backward since
the days of the Nizam. It is true that over the decades the development of
the region has lagged behind and the scope for employment opportunities has
not been commensurate to the needs. The proportion of irrigated area to
total sown area is less in Telangana and the Rayalaseema areas. Most of the
educationally backward mandals are situated in Telangana and North Andhra. A
large section of those who suffer due to the underdevelopment of the
Telangana region are the tribals, dalits and minorities.
The
division of the state of Andhra Pradesh is however, not the solution for the
problems of backwardness. It will be misleading to conclude that a separate
state per se will ensure
development. The problems of underdevelopment and socio-economic
backwardness have to be tackled through specific measures.
Priority
should be given to those irrigation projects which cater to the needs of
Telangana and other backward areas of Andhra Pradesh.
A
comprehensive land distribution programme should be undertaken in the state
with special focus on Telangana.
A
crash programme has to be adopted to improve educational facilities in the
identified backward mandals.
Special
measures must be adopted to improve the economic and social position of the
dalits, girijans (tribal people) and minorities.
A
high-powered committee should be formed to undertake a comprehensive study
of the imbalanced development among different regions and districts. A
development index for each mandal should be developed on this basis and
comprehensive plans to be prepared.
There
should be strict implementation of GO No. 610 and rectification of past
distortions.
Special
funds to be earmarked for the development of backward areas in every budget
and a separate mechanism to be created to oversee the implementation of the
special plans for the backward areas.
We urge the sub-committee on Telangana of the United Progressive Alliance to consider all these aspects carefully. It should also keep in mind that the division of Andhra Pradesh which was the first major state to be formed on the linguistic basis will open up a plethora of demands for new states to be carved out from the existing linguistic states. Instead of tackling the root cause of regional imbalance, backwardness and underdevelopment, the demand for setting up of new states will be a diversion and open up a host of intra-state problems which can heighten differences and weaken the unity of the people. (INN)