People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXIV
No.
19 May 09, 2010 |
May Day 2010 & Socialist
Consciousness
Sukomal Sen
MAY
Day 2010 will be observed in an unprecedented international and
national
situation when the World Capitalist system has been engulfed in grave
crisis,
economically, socially and culturally. Added to this is the political
turmoil
and deep discontent of the suffering people which are rocking a number
of governments
in the world.
All
these developments expose, more than ever, the unsustainability of the
capitalist system itself.
The
stormy eight hours struggle in
Today,
when in the phase of imperialist globalisation, 8 hours work norm which
was
universally accepted after
some time of 1986 episode, has been
trampled under foot with vengeance by the world capitalism itself is
amply confirming the absolute correctness
of the
battle cry raised by the heroes of May Day Episode�the
capitalist system has to be brought to an end and wage-slavery of
the labour has to be abolished.
The
eight hours struggle could not however throw up the issue of socialism
as the
only alternative to capitalism, the leaders of the movement in
But
now, at the end of the first decade of 21st century when the
international working class and the entire toiling people have
undergone a
number of revolutionary upheavals against capitalism and success of
socialist
revolutions in a number of non-advanced countries and the impact of
imperialist
globalisation followed by grave world crisis of capitalism, it has
become the bounden duty of the working
class of any
country to popularise the idea of socialism and May Day celebration
would be a very
befitting occasion when the agenda of socialism should be brought to
the fore
and march forward with the goal of its realisation in practical terms.
ANTAGONISTIC
SOCIAL CONDITIONS
The
human race
is the most important treasure in the world. And yet historically, most
of
humanity has developed under con�ditions of antagonistic social
classes, under
social relations based �on
exploitation. These conditions have encouraged human qualities for heightened individualism, hyper consumerism,
egotism, apathy, alienation, greed, and
cynicism and in the phase of neo-liberal globalisation and its culture,
these
traits have come to be further pronounced.
William
Shakespeare said in one of his plays through his hero that money is the
biggest
god of humankind. He said this almost 450 years back. But now in this
phase of
capitalism, lust for money, careerism, opportunism, utter indifference
to
struggles, trade unions and politics etc. have been raised to the peak.
These
traits are antagonistic to socialist ideals.
In
multi-national, multi-ethnic, multi-caste and multi-religions Indian
conditions,
it has created more problems against socialist ideas as all these
inimical traits
have dangerously come to the fore in the present political situation in
The
important
point for understanding why individuals think and act the way they do,
as Marx,
Lenin, and others -- for example, Hochi Minh, Mao Tse Dong, Castro and Che Guevara have demonstrated, is that
individual thought and experience are best understood by using an
objective
economic analysis and historical materialist view of consciousness that
does
not separate the indi�vidual from social context.
The
current
complex and contradictory context in many devel�oping countries
reflects a
fierce ideological struggle between two fundamentally different
worldviews:
Marxist-Leninist and bour�geois. These two opposing frameworks compete
to
influence the consciousness of the majority, their ideas, habits, and
points of
view, for example about what the main problems are today and how best
to
resolve them, even criteria for being "happy." Powerful imperialist
forces are dedicated to producing and distributing propaganda promoting
selfishness, insatiable desires for material goods, etc. Many of these
pressures are sophisticated: promoting ideas that, on the surface,
appear
progressive, but instead are reframed so as to be reactionary. Dominant
contemporary notions of "human rights," "free" assembly,
individual "initiative," understanding of why certain
countries remain poor while others remain
rich serve as exam�ples.
DEVELOPMENT
OF
REVOLUTIONARY
CONSCIOUSNESS
In
order for
socialism to be constructed and maintained indi�viduals who understand
the
value of cooperation for universal aims, who demonstrate genuine
concern for
the common good and solidarity with working people throughout the world are essential. At the same time, the
transformation of society into a mature socialist society requires
individuals
with these per�spectives. Revolutionary consciousness is both required
for
fighting and construction of socialism. Marx, Engels, and later Lenin
demonstrated the relationship between change in social conditions and
change in
people themselves � through socialist education and socialist practice,
guided
by scientific socialist theory.
Still,
it is
not uncommon to hear some people professing to be socialists and
Marxists argue
that ever-expanding economic development will, by itself, result in the
establishment of socialist relations of production and therefore
socialism. The
achievement of socialism is, from this perspective, largely a technical
Issue.
From this viewpoint, revolutionary consciousness, if considered at all,
is
presumed to result once a certain level of economic development has
been
attained. The assumption is that if the proper political party is in
power,
thereby guiding the building of a socialist society, then the
destructive
contradictions of bourgeois society will be overcome. This perspective
also
typically maintains that (a) developing consciousness is secondary to
expanding
the forces of production, and (b) mobilising people in support of State
policies is sufficient for developing socialist consciousness.
History
has
demonstrated, however, that economic development can continue to evolve
and
expand, using highly advanced science
and technology, without either the establishment of socialist relations
of
production or socialist consciousness. Even as the material foundation
for
socialism exists in the
A transition from capitalism to
socialism occurs not automatically but
by conscious efforts that is, by people who understand what they are
creating and why. People with particular
perspectives, habits, customs, beliefs, criteria, attitudes,
relationships with others-in addition to specific abilities and
knowledge-are
crucial in order for socialism to advance. In What Is to Be Done, Lenin
addressed how the working class becomes conscious as a class, for
itself. Such understanding
was necessary for him in order to argue and develop revolutionary
strategy.
Lenin argued that the widespread development of revolutionary,
scientific consciousness
was necessary in order to transform the existing socio-economic system
into one
that functioned in the interests of the majority of the population,
enabling
individuals to fully realise their human
potential. While attaining socialist consciousness
is a long-term process, postponing systematic attention to this process
until a
certain level of economic development has been attained undermines the
ability
of the masses to learn to plan and manage society in all its aspects.
It also
fails to increase the number of individuals who identify with socialist
aims.
Thus while developing the economy is essential to building socialism,
those who
treat economic growth as the sole objective of
socialism via developing productive forces
fail to grasp the essential role of ideo1ogy
in the class struggle and its critical importance during all stages of
economic
development and social transformation.
While
the
Communist Party aims to represent the interests of the working class
and to be
the primary vehicle
that enables and supports the working class
to fulfill its political functions, at the same time, the
workers�
dictatorship is not something that can be carried out by any group
other than
the working class itself. The dictatorship of the proletariat is a
dynamic
process effectively exercised by the working class. Indeed, a Marxist
view of
democracy is when the vast majority of the population exercises state
power by
itself and for itself, assuming its role and rights in directing and
managing
society. Structuring broad popular
participation into political, eco�nomic, cultural,
and social decision- making at local,
regional, and national levels of society is essential to ensure that
the State indeed
functions in the interests of the majority of ordinary people. State
power
therefore poses the question of participation. Popular struggles around
concrete issues, especially when guided by communists and their allies,
also
help ensure that the interests of the majority are protected by
confronting
abuses of power and by demanding justice, grassroots self-organisation,
promoting the interests of the working classes, where leaders are held
accountable to those common aims, help raise consciousness, may result
in real
victories, and can help lay the groundwork for broader, long-lasting
changes.
The issue is also how to get ever closer to the popular masses, in
order to
under�stand their issues, their dreams, their forms of resistance, and
to work
with them towards common goals. The
ideological battle is won in practical work, not at the level of ideas.
LEARNING
BY PRACTICE
AND
STUDY OF THEORY
It
is important
for people to contribute to socialist ideology and the corresponding
policies
and programmes and not simply "receive" them. At the same time, the
better people understand existing con�ditions, the more effectively
they can
confront the diverse array of problems that do and will exist. In this
way
people can come to better understand the dimensions of any particular
problem
that go beyond direct experience. The goal is to continually deepen and
broaden peoples' knowledge, imagination, and
skills. Thus, in order for the dictatorship of the working class to be
a reality,
the masses must be able to lead and rule. This means using
Marxism-Leninism in
a practical and systematic way, not spontaneously or erratically. The
application of Marxist methodology must become part of day�-to-day
practice in
appraising and addressing social phenomena.
As
Lenin explained,
�The consciousness of the working masses cannot be gen�uine
class-consciousness, unless the workers learn, from con�crete, and
above all
from topical, political facts and events, to observe every other
social
class in all the manifestations of its intellectual, ethical,
and
political life; unless they learn to apply in practice the materialist
analysis
and the materialist estimate of all aspects of the life and
activity of all
classes, strata, and groups of the population� (V I Lenin, What
Is to Be
Done; in vol 5 of Collected Works [Moscow: Progress
Press, 1973],
412).
Clearly,
a
purposeful, systematic, and ongoing process of education, broadly
defined, is necessary
in order to achieve advanced ideological
development. Thus the role of the subjective, of consciousness, of
motivations,
of initiative, of ideology, of explicitly communist education, is of
prime
importance in the class struggle and in progressing towards socialism.
The
study of
theory without learning how best to apply it will not build socialism.
Being
able to quote or recite passages from classic works does not mean that
one can
apply Marxist methodol�ogy, or content, to contemporary problems.
Having faith
that the classics hold answers to contemporary problems does not
further Marxism,
socialism, or scientific development. Individuals, organizations and
institutions must be able to use theory,
creatively, to understand and reconstruct the world. Scientific
development
itself implies and demands the application of theory.
YOUNGER
GENERATION MUST
TAKE
UP THE CHALLENGE
Younger
generations must be politically and ideologically prepared for the many
situations in which they find themselves, including their work and
their
workplace, viewing films, listening to music, reading literature, their
relationships with others, includ�ing nonsocialists. The challenges of
the
twenty-first century require that young and old understand the nature
of the
problems they are facing, the roots of the problems they are
encountering.
Party lead�ers and intellectuals at all levels must deepen their
understanding
of opportunism and revisionism and understand the importance of the
analysis of
everyday life. In their day-to-day life, ordinary people must see that
the
common goal is for the wealth they create to be used primarily to
satisfy human
needs, not to profit others. Ideology is a concrete thing. Its power
resides in
the fact that it is contained within our everyday activities.
Education
in
any and all societies intends to influence both thinking and social
behavior;
it cannot be a neutral endeavor. Education aims to imbue others with
particular
qualities and instill a particular world outlook, even guidelines for
human
conduct. Similarly, socioeconomic development requires building
strategically
on current conditions. The same holds true for ideological work.
In
a society
with a preponderance of capitalist relations of production, socialist
consciousness must be acquired in the midst of an opposing mentality.
It has to
transform an existing ideological structure and further, be
accomplished by
people who may be products of another kind of society or, who, for
other
reasons, posses many of those traits. Ideological limits therefore
typically
exist among teachers and leaders as well within pupils. For these as
well as
other reasons, a process of education, reeducation and self-education
will be a
long-term undertaking. The customs and habits people have acquired over
time
are not easily changed. Marx once said, �The tradition of all the dead
generations weighs like a nightmare on the brain of the living� (The
Eighteenth
Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte; in vol 11 of MECW [New York: International
Publishers, 1979] 103)
Then,
anticipation of socialism derives from the contradictions within
capitalism,
irrespective of whether these have evolved into embryonic socialist
forms. Most
notable is the revolutionary role to be played by the working class �
with
capitalism creating, expanding, strengthening and organising labour for
the
purposes of production, but necessarily exploiting the working majority
and
failing to meet its broader economic and social aspirations. In a
telling
phrase of the Communist Manifesto, �what
the bourgeoisie ... produces, above all, is its own grave-diggers. Its
fall and
the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable.�
Such
prognoses stand shoulder to shoulder with the slogan that marks Marx�s
epitaph,
the eleventh thesis on Fuerbach: �The
philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the
point is to
change it.� As with much of Marx�s writings, this call to
nineteenth-century socialists should be interpreted both as a means of
gaining
understanding as well as an imperative to act. It remains fully valid
into the
twenty-first century and today�s world further confirms the definition
of trade
unions as an organised force for
superseding the very system of wage-labour and capital rule itself?
Marx
predicted the onset of Globalisation. Marx could not see, but the
present
generation has experienced the rise of capitalism to its peak, what is
called
neo-liberal globalisation of economy.
We
would only repeat, come what may, the
proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. Working
men of All Countries Unite!
Let
the revolutionary goal of socialism be the battle cry of May Day 2010
and that
will be the fittest tribute to the supreme sacrifices made by the
heroes of May
Day episode of 1886.