People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXIV
No.
26 June 27, 2010 |
INTERVIEW
WITH BUDDHADEB
BHATTACHARYA ON 33 YEARS OF LEFT FRONT GOVT IN
'The
Meaning of So-Called
“Change”
is Anarchy'
The Left
Front government in
On the recent
defeats in polls
The Left
Front has gained
majority support for consecutive seven terms from 1977. The results of
last Lok
Sabha elections was an exception. Same trends have been noticed in
other
elections thereafter. After the Lok Sabha elections, we have reviewed
the
results. We have identified the areas in government’s planning and
actions
where there are mistakes. For example, we are now alert on the question
of land
acquisition. We will protect the fertile lands while non fertile lands
would be
used for industrialisation. In this case too, we have to be much more
sincere
on compensation and rehabilitation. If the poor people feel ignored in
any area
of government and panchayat activities, we have to correct those
mistakes. We
have to be more sincere about the development of minorities.
We have also
identified problems
in the organisation of Party. There have been instances of undesirable
activities which have dented Party’s image. We have decided to rectify
quickly.
Is there a
problem in the relationship with the peasantry?
The Left
Front was born through
continuous peasant movement along with the movements of workers,
employees,
teachers, students, youth, women. Left Front has progressed through
land
struggle and struggle for sharecroppers’ rights. The peasantry was
deprived in
the Congress regime. They were given due honour during the Left Front
period.
Around 11 lakh acres of land was distributed to the poor and marginal
farmers
through land reforms. More than 15 lakh sharecroppers were recorded.
Overwhelming
sections of the peasantry support the Left. One aspect of the Singur
and
Nandigram episode was our target for industrialisation and generation
of
employment. But a section of the peasantry and the general people did
not
accept our stand. To them transfer of land for industries became major
concern
while they did not comprehend the alternatives. We have now become more
careful. The policies for acquisition of land for industries and
rehabilitation must be made more
realistic, so that the peasantry and the people in general accept that
and
participate voluntarily.
On the
continuous obstruction by opposition parties
It is true
that the organised
obstruction to resist governmental projects has increased after the
last Lok
Sabha elections, for example, in Nayachar petrochemicals project, in
power
project in Katwa, expansion of national highway etc. Despite this, we
have
progressed during this period. The agricultural production has
increased. More
than Rs 7000 crore have been invested in industries in the last one
year.
Clusters for small industries have been constructed. The number of
schools and
colleges has increased while new universities have been started. Very
soon work
of
It would have
been correct for
the opposition parties to support the government in developmental
activities.
However, they have continuously put obstacles. Whatever be the
situation, we
will forge ahead with our programme. We cannot remain idle.
On the
priorities of the Left Front government
The
priorities can be best
summarised as follows: to take the success of states’ agriculture to a
new high
banking on the success of the land reforms in the state; to fasten up
the pace
of the process of industrialisation in the state; to advance in the field of human resource development
through advancing the success in
education, health and related
areas. Our topmost emphasis is on the socio-economic development of
backward
sections, including schedule castes, schedule tribes and minorities.
We have
emphasised in
distribution of homestead lands in rural and urban areas. Emphasis has
been
given on employment generation.
On Maoist
terror
One of the
major problems in the Jangal
Mahal area is the terror and annihilation campaign unleashed by
the
'Maoists'. We are fighting them both politically and administratively.
But the
complexity of the situation is that the main opposition party and some
organisations are encouraging them either directly or indirectly. We
treat this
problem as a political problem.
Of course,
the problem has an
all-India perspective. 'Maoists' are active in seven to eight states.
As they
have chosen poorer areas as their terrain, it is necessary to initiate
socio-economic measures to isolate them. It is also necessary to face
them politically
apart from activating the police and administration. It is a long term
fight
and there is no easy solution.
On the
so-called slogan of “change”
What is the
real meaning of
so-called slogan of “change”? Whatever has been done by us, would be
changed
retrogressively? Will the lands which have come in the hands of the
peasants be
returned back to landlords? Will the investments for industries be
returned?
Will the decentralisation of power through panchayats and urban local
bodies be
dismantled? The people of