People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXIV
No.
50 December 12, 2010 |
Who is Afraid of 2G?
Prabir
Purkayastha
THE 2G scam is being stone-walled by the
ruling UPA both in parliament and outside. A joint parliamentary
committee would
have both the right and the authority to go into the conduct of the
various
ministers, the regulatory body namely TRAI and also examine the
different
dimensions of the case. If Congress is not involved, blaming Raja in
private as
the sole perpetrator of the 2G scam, why is the Congress shying away
from a
JPC?
While Raja’s guilt is now public, the only
question remaining is whether he can be brought to book, the larger
question
still remains. For whose benefit did Raja act? If Rs 1.76 lakh crore of
a
scarce natural resource –- the spectrum – was gifted away, who
benefited from
this private appropriation of this national resource? In other words
who
dun’it? For this, the media, which has
been vociferous on Raja has been remarkably quiet.
We have now two sources of information –
one the pain-staking research done by CAG and the other the Radia
tapes. Both
can be used to bring out the hidden contours of the 2G scam and answer
who was
behind the scam.
2G:
MORE TO THE STORY
THAN
HAS BECOME PUBLIC
The CAG report makes clear some of the
beneficiaries. One is of course the real estate company, Unitech. They
were in
deep financial crisis with the sinking of Lehman Brothers, and the
sudden
collapse of the financial markets.
Suddenly, they were faced with large projects which they were
undertaking and no money to execute them. If Unitech had been unable to
lay
hands on money very quickly – either through borrowings or any other
way, it is
quite possible Unitech would have collapsed.
The records now make clear that the 2G licenses were the
mechanism
through which Unitech re-floated itself.
One part of this is already widely known --
Unitech sold its shares to Telenor. The CAG report says that 67.25 per
cent
shares were transferred at a price of Rs 6,120 crore to Telenor Asia.
The CAG report
also makes clear that apart from the licenses, Unitech had made
virtually no
investments in the telecom companies it had floated. It is clear that
if we
take out Rs 1,651 crore it paid for the licenses for the 22 circles, it
made a
windfall profit of three times that amount, plus
it still retained about one third of the shares it could
unload later in the market. All in all,
a neat hefty gain of about Rs 10-12, 000 crore in six months on an
investment
of Rs 1,651 crore. Plus whatever it took to bend the system. As we all
know
–thanks to CAG -- bending the system consisted of illegal papers
submitted to
DoT, as none of the Unitech companies met the license conditions and of
course
Raja’s famous first-serve-my-friends irrespective-of-who-comes rule.
But this is not all that Unitech got. Nor
was Raja the only one helping Unitech. Pioneer
reports that Unitech got loans of “Rs 10,000 crore from various public
sector
banks, including the SBI which doled out more than Rs 8,000 crore”. If
this is
true, there is more to the 2G story than has become public.
It seems Unitech was not the only
beneficiary of the banks. A total of five of the companies – all of
them held
to be ineligible by CAG – got a total of Rs 26,000 crore from public
sector
banks as loans. The list includes Swan Telecom, Unitech,
Is this why the Congress is afraid of a
deeper probe? Did all this happen with these companies waving in front
of the
banks the telecom licenses that they had illegally secured or were
there more
hands in the till, than Raja’s? Was it a collaborative venture in which
Raja
and the ministry of telecom were undoubtedly the lynch-pins but by no
means the
only ones? Is that why a Manish Tewari keeps on talking about a
“presumptive”
loss whenever the 2G scam is discussed on TV, diverting it from any
other
discussion?
Well the presumptive loss claptrap that
Manish Tewari pulls is very easy to dismiss. Just cancel the illegal
licenses
and auction them again. Or ask the companies to pay a benchmark price
based on
the 3G spectrum and see what happens. In spite of patent illegalities
in the
award of licenses to companies who have lied and submitted false
papers, why is
the UPA and the Congress still sticking to these companies? We come
back to our
initial question, who dun'it and what does the UPA have to hide?
The second set of questions pertain to the
Radia tapes, Ratan Tata and his outburst about privacy and
WHO
DUN'IT & WHAT DOES
THE
UPA HAVE TO HIDE?
First of all, the key question is on whose
behalf was Radia pulling the strings to secure Raja his berth as
telecom minister
again? It is clear from the tapes that Raja getting a second term as
telecom minister
was of vital importance to Radia. If we look at the list of
beneficiaries of
the telecom scam, it is clear that the only one who benefited from the
telecom
scam and was also a client of Niira Radia, was the Tata Group. Tata and
Reliance (Anil Ambani) both held CDMA licenses and were eager to enter
the far
more lucrative GSM market. While Anil Ambani's Reliance Telecom was
definitely
one of the players behind Raja, Niira
Radia was working for Mukesh Ambani and locked in a bitter battle with
Anil’s
PR apparatus. This is borne out by the Vir Sanghvi- Radia conversation
and his
subsequent column where he virtually repeats about Anil Ambani whatever
Radia
tells him on the phone. Anil’s access to Raja therefore was not through
Radia
and an independent one. The CDMA operators
-- Reliance and Tatas -- also got GSM licenses at 2001 price in 2008
and
therefore made a killing. The only conclusion one can come to is that
amongst
the major telecom companies who benefited hugely from the scam and were
tied up
with Raja via Radia is the Tatas.
This was not all. Tata also sold about 25
per cent of equity of his Tata Teleservices to NTT Docomo for about Rs
13,000
crore. Raja's allowing acquisitions in contravention with DoT
guidelines
earlier was the key to Unitech, Tatas, and Swan selling part of their
equity at
these prices. And as the CAG report has held, the spectrum was the most
valuable part of what these companies were selling.
This makes a mockery of Tata’s claim to
privacy. One cannot employ a wheeler-dealer to pull strings in the
government,
who was also in all kinds of financial “jugglery” and therefore under
the
Enforcement Directorate scanner, and then howl about banana republics
and
privacy. The simple question is that the tapping of Radia's phone line
was to
do with possible financial crimes and does not appear to be done with
any
political motive. Is Tata saying that all telephone conversations, even
when
crimes are being discussed and planned, should not be subject to State
tapping?
Or they should be tapped only for non-financial crimes such as national
security? If he employs a person because of her ability to
corrupt the system, why should he now shelter
behind privacy? Privacy for crooks? If he is so high-minded, why does
he not
offer to pay the difference between the market price for the
under-valued
license he secured? One cannot benefit
from crime and yet claim high moral ground!
The third beneficiary in this who dun'it is
of course Anil Ambani. He benefited in two ways. One part of his scam
is pretty
straight forward. He, in company with Tatas, benefited equally from
getting a
cross-over All India license at 2001 prices. So, like Tata, he also got
GSM,
his license at dirt cheap price. But that is not all he got. The CAG
report
also makes clear that Swan Telecom had Reliance
Telecom's
equity to the tune of Rs 1,002.79 crore in contrast to Tigers Traders
Private Ltd, which held nearly 90 per cent stake, but had put in just
Rs 98.22
crore. Reliance Telecom paid a Rs 999 premium on Re 1 shares of Swan, a
company
that was registered only a few months before. Further, CAG says, “Audit
also
found that the email ID of the corporate as well as registered office of the Swan Telecom Private Limited in
their
application dated March 2, 2007 was shown as [email protected]
The
same email ID ([email protected]
relianceada.com) also was given for the
correspondence address and the
authorised contact person of
the applicant
company”. Swan was nothing but a front organisation for Anil Ambani
group.
Since Anil already had a GSM license, the one he got in the name of
Swan was up
for sale. According to the CAG report, Swan sold 44.73 per cent of its
shares
at Rs 3,217 crore to Etisalat International India Ltd.
Who holds the rest of the shares now is
still a question. Anil Ambani's group denies that it holds the rest of
the
shares, but they have yet to explain why the company secretary Hari Nair had given a Reliance email address as his
address and who is this Mr Hari Nair? And why does he have a Reliance
email
address if he does not belong to Reliance?
The key issue before the Congress and the
UPA is that they either stonewall all the questions and let the
corporate
houses pocket all the wealth generated from this gross undervaluation
of the
spectrum or come clean and take action. Action is not just throwing
Raja out
after resisting the demand for his ouster for as long as they could.
The UPA is
already complicit in the cover up of the telecom scam by slowing down
the CBI
probe and then putting in a CVC – PJ Thomas – who was himself a party
to the
telecom cover up. This apart from his having a pending criminal case
against
him.
Till date, there is no movement in trying
to recover the Rs 1.76 lakh crore the country has lost due to giving
away
spectrum at throw away prices to the fat cats in the country. We need
action –
cancellation of licenses and some cases being launched before any one
will take
the government's claims on telecom seriously.
The final question – why is the Congress
afraid of 2G? Or what is it about 2G that scares the Congress?