People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXV
No.
20 May 15, 2011 |
TRIPURA
Kim Davy’s
Revelation Confirms Congress’s 1988 Ploy
Haripada Das
THE
mastermind of Purulia
(
It is
imperative to let
the countrymen know what a hateful step the central government resorted
to in
order to oust the Left Front government,
led by the late Comrade Nripen Chakraborty, in the tiny state of
Tripura, situated
in North Eastern region. From the pre-poll eventualities and post-poll
revelations, anybody can surmise the deep rooted conspiracy that was
hatched up
by using the highest office of the central government, flouting all the
legal
and moral norms of the land, in order to unseat the Left Front
government by hijacking
the popular mandate.
A
GLIMPSE
OF
HISTORY
Since 1983,
under the
command of Bijoy Kumar Hrangkhawl, the Tripura National Volunteers
(TNV) had
been carrying out most ravaging attacks from its base camp in
As it had
only limited
security forces at its disposal, the state government kept frantically
urging the
central government for deployment of sufficient paramilitary forces for
combating the TNV extremists, and sealing of the Indo-Bangladesh border
which
was extremely porous at that time. But with its own ulterior motive,
the
central government hardly paid any heed to the urgings of the state
government.
It was at such a juncture that general elections to the state assembly
were
fixed for February 2, 1988.
Immediately
after the declaration
of elections, several central ministers including Santosh Mohan Deb,
the then telecommunication
minister, began to camp at Agartala and directly or indirectly
interfere in the
state government’s affairs, in favour of the Congress.
Rajiv Gandhi,
the then prime
minister, visited Tripura twice --- first on November 28, 1987,
accompanied by
Mizoram chief minister Lalthanhawala and later towards the end of the
polling campaign
on January 28-29, 1988. Coinciding with it, just before his second
visit to the
state, the TNV resorted to indiscriminate mass killings, surpassing all
the preceding
massacres in respect of the number of casualties as well as in
barbarism.
Within a week from January 25 to 31, the TNV extremists butchered no
less than
91 people including infants, children, women and the aged in 14
cowardly
attacks in selective places, in order to incite anti-Left passions in
various
subdivisions of the state. The main thrust of Rajiv Gandhi’s speech now
was that
the Left Front government had utterly failed to provide security of
life and
property to the people. “I assure, if Congress is voted to power, they
will
protect you,” he added.
Surprisingly,
on January 29
morning, the prime minister informed the press about an incident of
mass
killing at Mechuria in Kamalpur subdivision --- even before it actually
took
place. In fact, the killing took place within an hour of his
announcement, as
if on a clue. Rajiv Gandhi went back to
The Congress
utilised this
situation very carefully. At Gabordi in Sadar subdivision (
In spite of
all such heinous
tricks, the Congress could not have obtained a majority if it had not
forcibly
occupied several counting halls, with the blessings of central
ministers, in
order to rig the results. In Majlishpur assembly constituency in Sadar,
the Left
Front candidate Manik Dey took a lead in the final tally, and the
returning
officer (RO) rejected the Congress candidate’s appeal for recounting.
The result
was announced and Manik Dey was declared elected from this
constituency. But the
Congress candidate pressed for recounting, and the RO referred it to
the chief
election commissioner for a decision. The commissioner categorically
told the
RO, mentioning the provisions of the Election Conduct Rule, that at
that stage
no petition for recounting could be entertained. But the central
ministers
camping at Agartala interfered to suppress the commission’s message and
the RO
was forced to order recounting under duress. Thus a victorious Manik
Dey was
made to lose the election. The Congress resorted to similar
highhandedness in some
other seats as well, with the help of the central ministers camping in
the
state at that time.
STARK
REVELATION
Bijoy Kumar
Hrangkhawl and
his followers surrendered to the resultant Congress-TUJS coalition
government
on August 12, 1988. Hrangkhawl was flown to New Delhi from the remote
jungle of
Gobindabari in the Longthorai Valley subdivision and was given a warm
reception
as chief guest at the Independence Day function that year, at the Red
Fort in New
Delhi. When asked by the press about the mass killings committed by the
TNV,
Hrangkhawl plainly admitted that his boys had carried out some
incidents, but
denied any role in a few other 2/3 incidents including that of Gabordi.
These,
he said, had nothing to do with the TNV.
The dark
character of the
entire episode came to light on August 22, 1988, when Zoeng,
an Aizwal based biweekly, published three instances of correspondence
between Rajiv Gandhi, Mizoram chief minister Lalthanhawala and TNV
supremo
Bijoy Kumar Hrangkhawl regarding the surrender deal. It was
Lalthanhawala who made
these letters published in order to take the credit for the TNV’s
surrender, claiming
himself to be the key man in the entire negotiation. The letters are
reproduced
below:
Hrangkhawl’s letter to
Lalthanhawala, October 27, 1987:
I
am glad to have received your kind reply of dated 17th
October, ’87. So it is my second letter to you. I am sending two
persons as my
official representatives alongwith two letters; one is for you and
another is
for the Prime Minister Mr Rajiv Gandhi.
My
representatives, bearer of this letter, shall be under
your safe protection until and unless a positive reply on this regard
has been
received from Mr Gandhi.
I
wish they would not face any problem on security matter. So
as long as they are there inside Mizoram, you would be fully
responsible on
their security.
Lastly,
I have also authorised them that, if necessary, on
any preliminary agreement to two of my points (written in the letter to
the
Prime Minister Mr Rajiv Gandhi) could be executed by them. And any
communication should be in written.
Thanking
you
Hrangkhawl’s letter to
Rajiv Gandhi through Lalthanhawala, October 27,1987:
Honourable
Prime Minister,
For
national and greater interests, I have felt that
immediately we should sit together and solve our problems.
So
within very short future I want to receive your written
reply on this regard. And my first contact is Mr Lalthanhawala, the
Congress(I)
leader of Mizoram. I have enough confidence on him to immediately link
us, so
that without any hindrance on the red tape, things are done.
If
delayed and neglected, then it would be on your
responsibility to explain the reason. Moreover, on security ground it
shall not
be possible for me to send out representatives out of my reach time to
time.
Therefore,
I would acknowledge that Tripura is an integral
part of India and commit to solve all problems within the framework of
Indian
Constitution and the condition that before any negotiation is resumed,
you
shall have to:
Immediately
dissolve CPI(M)-led Ministry of Tripura , and
Declare
of ceasefire on both sides
Thanking
you.
Lalthanhawala, envoy of the
prime minister, wrote to on December 6, 1987:
I
have received your letter of 27th October together with the
letter for Shri Rajiv Gandhi and thank you for the same.
I
immediately rushed to New Delhi and met the Prime Minister.
In fact we went together to Tripura on 28th November and returned to
New Delhi
the same day. As I have written to you, New Delhi welcomes settlement
of any
problem within the Constitution through peaceful manner. Of course, it
has to
be with mutual trust and confidence with a spirit of reconciliation.
However,
New Delhi is not in a position to take immediate initiative because
elections
to the Legislative Assembly of Tripura has been announced for 2nd
February and
the time at the disposal of New Delhi is too short now. On top of this
our
party is not in power in Tripura, which make the situation more
difficult for
the centre.
It
is therefore felt that the atmosphere is not ripe for
starting a dialogue till the election is over. However, I can assure
you, from
what I could gather from my discussion with Shri Rajiv Gandhi and Shri
Buta
Singh, that they are keen for a peaceful settlement of the problem and
that
they will take initiative for starting dialogue after the election,
whether we
come to power or not.
With
regards
YET
ANOTHER
CORRESPONDENCE
Sudhir Ranjan
Majumder,
leader of Opposition in the Tripura legislative assembly and president
of the Tripura
Congress Committee, wrote on December 21, 1987, the following letter,
on his
MLA’s pad, to Hrangkhawl who was then at Singlung in Bangladesh.
Dear
friend Bijoy Kr. Hrangkhawl,
I
think you had received my letter which I wrote to you on
13.12.87. Doing action at Ompi (Taidu) I think you have accept my all
conditions. So I now request you, you please terrorise and continue
mass
killing of innocent persons particularly women and children of North
and South
Tripura. If you do so then the forthcoming Assembly Election will be
pospond
and the Presidential rule will be imposed automatically by which we can
easily
thrown out the Left Front govt from Tripura. If you help us in this way, I
assure you I will help you to join in our govt. like Mizoram. I had a
long
discussion about this issue with Sri Santosh Mohan Deb, the Minister of
State
for Communication. I write this letter to you by his suggestion. It is
Santoshda’s duty to convince our Prime Minister. You please write a
letter
politely to the Prime Minister about your won thinkings.
Moreover,
you please send 100 nobs. Revolver and 5 nobs SLR
for my workers with my massanger Sri Anil Chakma.
With
revolutionary greetings.
(MLA’s Seal)
[Spelling and
grammar are
as in the original letter --- Ed.]
The above
correspondence
establishes that till the surrender was accomplished, Rajiv Gandhi
never
disclosed the surrender proposal to the state government which had
issued a
standing call to all the misguided tribal youths to surrender. It had
also
assured them that, if necessary, it would negotiate with the central
government
on this issue.
Secondly, it
is evident
that B K Hrangkhawl wanted to come to the negotiation table as early as
in
October 1987. Thus, long before the Assembly election which was held in
February 2, 1988, Rajiv Gandhi had had ample time to pursue the deal,
if only
he wanted to pursue it. Instead, for his narrow partisan interest, he
deferred
the deal till the assembly election were over.
Thirdly,
while deferring
the deal, Rajiv Gandhi made a signal to the TNV to intensify its
campaign of horrific
deeds that it had been carrying out for the preceding few years. The
aim was to
remove the Left Front government which was a common enemy of both the
Congress
and the TNV. The abrupt rage of attacks resulting in 91 casualties and
gutting
down of about a hundred houses, just in one week before the polls,
established
that the Congress manipulators and the TNV terrorists were aiding each
other.
Fourthly,
from the above correspondence,
it transpires that Congress leaders maintained regular links with Bijoy
Kumar
Hrangkhawl, supremo of the banned secessionist TNV, only to drag down
the Left
Front government through foul play.
Lastly,
maintaining its
nexus with an anti-national secessionist outfit, the Congress party and
its
government at the centre threw to the winds the very ideals of the
Indian constitution,
norm of federalism, democratic ethos and ethics, and the lofty ideas of
the
people’s sovereignty, harmony and unity. They did all this with just
one aim
--- to overthrow the Left Front government which was bearing the torch
of
alternative policies to the capitalist path of development.
Thus, the
above details
provide sufficient corroboration to what Kim Davy has exposed regarding
the supply
of arms to the Tripura extremists prior to the 1988 assembly elections.