People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXV
No.
30 July 24, 2011 |
Hills
Treaty Spurs
Alarm
in
From
Our Special
Correspondent
in Kolkata
THE
treaty for constituting a new “Gorkhaland
Territorial Authority” (GTA) in
During
the Left Front period, a number of
bipartite, tripartite and all party meetings were held. In the final
rounds of
tripartite in January 2011, there were broad agreements on issues
concerning
interim council, delegation of powers, including legislative powers.
The state
and central governments had agreed and persuaded Gorkha Janamukti
Morcha (GJM)
to agree to an elected council. The GJM, earlier, on its part was hell
bent on
running a council without any elections. One of the very important
elements of
tripartite talks was that the new council will be located within the
existing
boundary of Darjeeling Gorkha Hill Council, constituted in 1988. But, after returning from last talks, GJM
started an agitation demanding areas of Terai, Dooars and Siliguri
plains and
their movement turned violent. It was clear that the GJM was not ready
to
accept peace until the assembly elections. It also supported Trinamool
and
Congress candidates in constituencies outside hills.
The
state government under Mamata Banerjee
refused to reveal the agreement, not only before the signing but also
after
that. The central government also radically changed its position within
days.
The
first question is that in the new agreement,
the concept of a separate state has been accepted. It is written that
GJM,
while reiterating its demand for a separate state, has agreed for an
interim
elected authority. It was also written that the demand for a separate
state is
hereby recorded in the treaty. The new name of the authority has
completely
wiped out the word “
The
new treaty has arranged for a high power
committee to examine demands of including Terai, Dooars and Siliguri in
the
authority. GJM will have four members in the five member committee.
This has
enraged large sections of people in these areas. Consecutive strike
calls by
different organisations evoked strong response. The CPI(M) has opposed
such strikes
as they will contribute to ethnic enmity and harm the unity of the
people. In
fact, the scope for extending the jurisdiction of authority beyond
hills is a
real source of danger for the entire state. In fact, Bimal Gurung,
president of
GJM, has categorically announced that there would be no elections to
authority
till the areas from Terai and Dooars were elected. Gurung told this the
day
after the treaty was signed. He also drew attention to the fact that he
himself
has not signed the agreement (Roshan Giri, another leader signed on
behalf of
GJM), so that he could lead the struggle for a separate state.
Another
pertinent point is the constitutional
provision for such an authority or administration. There is no mention
of such
a provision in the treaty. Even union home minister P Chidambaram,
while
attending the signing ceremony, consciously avoided this important
question in
his speech.
The
CPI(M) has reiterated its position that the
Party is in favour of peace, democracy and regional autonomy for hill
areas
within