People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXV
No.
35 August 28, 2011 |
Haripada Das
TO
tame a state defying the anti-people liberalisation policies dictated
by the
centre, the UPA-2 government has adopted a policy not to beat but to
weaken it by
fiscal starvation through downgrading award of 13th Finance
Commission, said Badal Chowdhury, finance minister, government of
Tripura on
August 16, 2011. Chowdhury was addressing the media while releasing a
white
paper, ‘13th Finance Commission Report –
A Review’ which contains elaborate item-wise statistical data that
vindicates gross deprivation of the state of Tripura, compared to the
other
states including those having rich resources. This deprivation caused
an
unmanageable financial crunch for the government to pay salaries to its
employees, pension to the retired employees and release of DA and DR at
par
with central rate, Badal Chowdhury informed.
In
the preface, the document reads “The 13th finance commission
award
has significantly underestimated the state’s financial requirements and
failed
in appreciating circumstances specific to Tripura”.
Explaining
the specific circumstances, the document stated that the 13th
FC
regrettably failed to realise the ground reality behind the higher
government
employment in the state among the NE states.
The state had to be lacerated for decades due to extremist
onslaught and
necessitated to raise as many as 13 TSR battalions (Indian
Reserve
Battalions) who successfully helped in containing violence and
restoration of
peace and tranquility in the state. Also the 13th FC did not
consider the limited presence of private sector as well as public
sector in the
state thereby limiting the scope of employment of the innumerable
unemployed
youths. Even after exercising all avenues for government employment,
there is a
huge brigade of unemployed in the state.
Honouring
the electoral pledges made by Left Front, the state government did not
accept
some of the recommendations of the 12th FC in line with
liberalisation
policies. Those are: adoption of New Pension Scheme, closure of all
loss making
PSUs instead of providing them financial assistance for making them
self-reliant, abolition of vacant posts, ban on new recruits etc. If
the
prescription of the centre was complied with, the Left Front government would have had to retrench no less
than 30,000 employees in various sectors.
Regarding
item-wise award of the 13th FC, Badal Chowdhury informed
that
against the state’s demand of Rs
13,924.43 crores for salary expenditure, the 13th FC
awarded Rs 7727.90 cr, leaving the deficit of
Rs 6,196.53 cr. For pension
expenditure, the 13th FC awarded Rs 2,779.09 cr
against the state’s demand of Rs 3,944.80 cr creating
a deficit of Rs 1,165.71 cr. The 13th FC
also made a wide gap in non-plan
revenue expenditure by sanctioning Rs
3,192.26 cr against the state’s requirement of Rs
4,234.61 cr leaving a shortfall of Rs 1,039.35 cr.
In non-plan gap grant the commission granted Rs 4453.00 cr.
which is even far less
than Rs 5494.20 cr awarded by the12th FC (See
Table 3 & 5). In total, the 13 FC alloted only Rs
16,349.13 cr against the state
requirement of Rs 26,848.76 cr leaving
a shortfall of Rs 10,499.63 cr. (See
Table 1 & 4)
In
contrast to all other previous finance commissions which took the last
year of
the tenure of former commission as the base year for estimation of the
committed expenditure in the successive years, the 13th
finance
commission adopted a normative formula that had taken salary
expenditure in
2005-06, ie, the first year of the tenure of 12th finance
commission
and pension expenditure in 2007-08 as the base years for estimating the
expenditure on salary and pension during the tenure of the13th
FC.
By adopting this policy, the 13th FC quietly ignored the
enhanced
liabilities on salary and pension due to revision of pay,
regularisation of
DRW/contingent workers/fixed pay employees in the year 2009-10 apart
from the
new recruitments that were made after 2005-06.
Though most of the states more or less suffered with this
normative
formula, the states having wider resources would be able to manage this
loss.
But Tripura with its limited resources was hit hardest with this new
policy.
The
13th FC recommended year to year decrease of growth of
expenditure
on salary from 1.54 per cent in
years 2011-12 to 0.89 per cent in
2014-15. While most of the states were awarded with static or rising
yearly
growth rate of 5 per cent to 6 per cent
in average, Tripura had
been awarded with diminishing growth rate and that too lowest among all
states.
Any layman can appreciate that, not to speak of releasing of DA, even
paying of
normal annual increment of 3 per
cent would be impossible with such declining growth of allocations. (See Table -2)
The
deprivation of the 13th FC to the state was brought to the
notice of
the union finance minister Pranab Mukharjee several times in writing.
But no
remedial step was ever taken. When the state finance minister met
Mukharjee, he
summarily turned down the state’s demand for providing special
assistance to
overcome the present fiscal impasse. Expressing annoyance for
non-compliance of
the new economic reforms, he informed that he is binding with the 13th
finance commission and unable to extend any help beyond the
commission’s award,
Badal Chowdhury informed. But recently the centre has assured financial
incentive of an extent of more than Rs 21,000
cr to Mamata Banarjee government in
The
way for getting rid of this fiscal impasse, lies on the central
government. As
the state’s own resources are very limited, the fiscal crisis created
because
of the 13th FC award can be resolved through sincere
initiatives by the
planning commission, the finance ministry and other ministries of
government of
Table
1
Item
wise short-fall shown in the following table
(Rs in Crores)
SL |
Item |
State’s
Assessment |
13th
FC’s Award |
Shortfall |
1 |
Salary |
13924.43 |
7727.90 |
6196.53 |
2 |
Arrear salary
|
2200.00 |
0.00 |
2200.00 |
3 |
Interest
payment |
2544.93 |
2649.88 |
-104.95 |
4 |
Pension |
3944.79 |
2779.09 |
1165.70 |
5 |
Others |
4234.61 |
3192.26 |
1042.35 |
|
Total |
26848.76 |
16349.13 |
10499.63 |
Award
of the 13th FC on Salary Expenditure with year-wise growth
rate
(Rs
in Crores)
SL |
States |
Total
Salary Expenditure |
Year
to year Growth Rate |
|||
|
|
2010-15 |
2011-12 |
2012-13 |
2013-14 |
2014-15 |
1 |
AP |
83638.63 |
5.95 |
5.95 |
5.95 |
5.95 |
2 |
Arunachal P |
4438.27 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
3 |
|
35760.19 |
2.75 |
2.65 |
2.54 |
2.42 |
4 |
|
51584.79 |
5.92 |
5.92 |
5.92 |
5.92 |
5 |
Chhattisgarh |
21180.44 |
8.71 |
8.87 |
9.03 |
9.17 |
6 |
|
3764.89 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
7 |
|
28762.64 |
4.48 |
4.43 |
4.37 |
4.32 |
8 |
Haryana |
36387.99 |
5.99 |
5.99 |
5.99 |
5.99 |
9 |
Himachal P |
20024.90 |
2.27 |
2.13 |
1.99 |
1.83 |
10 |
J & K |
28691.10 |
3.42 |
3.35 |
3.29 |
3.22 |
11 |
Jharkhand |
27232.66 |
8.61 |
8.75 |
8.88 |
9.01 |
12 |
Karnataka |
29874.95 |
4014 |
4.07 |
4.00 |
3.92 |
13 |
Kerala |
31679.80 |
5.97 |
5.97 |
5.97 |
5.97 |
14 |
MP |
57609.69 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
15 |
Maharashtra |
76498.80 |
5.23 |
5.21 |
5.19 |
5.17 |
16 |
Manipur |
6671.89 |
3.62 |
3.56 |
3.50 |
3.44 |
17 |
Meghalaya |
5190.80 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
18 |
Mizoram |
4381.41 |
5.55 |
5.55 |
5.55 |
5.54 |
19 |
Nagaland |
7536.91 |
2.42 |
2.29 |
2.16 |
2.01 |
20 |
Orissa |
36688.62 |
5.96 |
5.96 |
5.96 |
5.96 |
21 |
Punjab |
48940.52 |
5.24 |
5.23 |
5.22 |
5.22 |
22 |
Rajasthan |
58811.27 |
4.15 |
4.12 |
4.08 |
4.04 |
23 |
Sikkim |
3192.19 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
24 |
Tamilnadu |
43207.39 |
5.96 |
5.95 |
5.95 |
5.95 |
25 |
Tripura |
7727.90 |
1.54 |
1.34 |
1.12 |
0.89 |
26 |
UP |
89043.78 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
6.00 |
27 |
Uttarakhand |
15225.45 |
8.33 |
8.52 |
8.69 |
8.86 |
28 |
West Bengal |
44521.82 |
5.98 |
5.98 |
5.98 |
5.98 |
Table
-3
The
Non-Plan gap grant recommended by the 13th FC is far less
than even
the 12th FC as shown below:
(Rs
in Crores)
Year |
1st
Year |
2nd
Yr |
3rd
Yr |
4th
Yr |
5th
Yr |
Total |
12th
FC |
1041.91 |
1064.30 |
1122.91 |
1131.90 |
1133.18 |
5494.20 |
13th
FC |
1054.00 |
934.00 |
1030.00 |
835.00 |
600.00 |
4453.00 |
Difference |
12.09 |
-130.30 |
-92.91 |
-296.90 |
-533.18 |
-1041.20 |
Table
4
State
wise comparison of awards of 12th FC and 13th FC
on Share
of Central Taxes + Non Plan Gap Grant + others
(Rs in Crores)
SL |
States |
Award
of 12th FC |
Award
of 13th FC |
%
of increase |
1 |
AP |
50353.26 |
114148.20 |
126.69 |
2 |
Arunachal P |
3525.56 |
9103.60 |
158.22 |
3 |
Assam |
24329.40 |
57832.70 |
137.71 |
4 |
Bihar |
75646.83 |
172944.10 |
128.62 |
5 |
Chhattisgarh |
18273.70 |
42000.70 |
129.84 |
6 |
Goa |
1724.53 |
4374.00 |
153.63 |
7 |
Gujarat |
25608.75 |
53789.40 |
110.04 |
8 |
Haryana |
8042.44 |
19470.30 |
142.09 |
9 |
Himachal P |
14450.36 |
21661.70 |
50.11 |
10 |
J & K |
20879.98 |
40438.60 |
93.67 |
11 |
Jharkhand |
23657.02 |
47878.60 |
102.39 |
12 |
Karnataka |
31416.28 |
74376.40 |
136.74 |
13 |
Kerala |
19607.72 |
40325.80 |
105.66 |
14 |
MP |
46321.96 |
116593.50 |
151.70 |
15 |
Maharashtra |
36194.25 |
91709.80 |
153.38 |
16 |
Manipur |
6870.20 |
13567.50 |
97.48 |
17 |
Meghalaya |
4367.77 |
9842.50 |
125.34 |
18 |
Mizoram |
4660.91 |
8805.30 |
88.92 |
19 |
Nagaland |
7453.41 |
13744.20 |
84.40 |
20 |
Orissa |
36942.77 |
78974.90 |
113.78 |
21 |
Punjab |
12884.59 |
25686.60 |
99.36 |
22 |
Rajasthan |
39062.47 |
97842.00 |
150.48 |
23 |
Sikkim |
1829.14 |
4525.60 |
147.42 |
24 |
Tamilnadu |
36688.13 |
83437.20 |
127.42 |
25 |
Tripura |
8417.00 |
13127.50 |
55.96 |
26 |
UP |
133471.45 |
312140.00 |
133.86 |
27 |
Uttarakhand |
12194.32 |
20308.10 |
66.54 |
28 |
West Bengal |
50877.28 |
117997.30 |
131.93 |
Tripura has second lowest increase in
award amount over 12th FC after Himachal Pradesh.
Table
5
Comparative
statement of Gap Grant awarded to the Special category states by the 12th
FC and 13th FC
(Rs
in Crores)
SL. |
Name of the
states |
Award by 12th
FC |
Award by 13th
FC |
% of
increase/ decrease |
1 |
Arunachal
Pradesh |
1357.88 |
2516.20 |
85.30 |
2 |
Himachal
Pradesh |
10202.38 |
7888.80 |
-22.68 |
3 |
Jammu &
Kashmir |
12353.46 |
15936.30 |
29.00 |
4 |
Manipur |
4391.98 |
6056.60 |
37.90 |
5 |
Meghalaya |
1796.86 |
2810.90 |
56.43 |
6 |
Mizoram |
2977.79 |
3991.40 |
34.04 |
7 |
Nagaland |
5536.50 |
8146.10 |
47.13 |
8 |
Tripura |
5494.20 |
4453.30 |
-18.95 |