People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXV
No. 48 November 27, 2011 |
Editorial
UPA Govt Blind to
People’s Miseries
THE issue of
relentless rise in the
prices of all essential commodities has rocked the winter
session of the
parliament as it began. This is only understandable. Food inflation now is
over 12 per cent. Vegetables
are costlier by 26 per cent, pulses by 14 per cent, fruits by 12
per cent,
eggs, fish and meat by 13 per cent and milk by 12 per cent.
During the last two
sessions of the parliament,
this very issue continues to dominate reflecting the agony and
concerns of the aam admi.
In the first of these sessions,
the Left parties had agreed, in order to prevent the disruption
of the parliament,
to an agreed resolution moved by the Chair in both the Houses on
this issue. A
discussion followed and the adopted resolution called upon the
government “to
take all measures to protect the common man from the negative
effects of
inflation”.
Despite this, there
was absolutely no
relief to the common man. On
the
contrary, the situation only worsened. In the last Monsoon
Session, once again,
this issue dominated the proceedings, naturally. The government and the
principal opposition
party came to an understanding on a common draft resolution
moved by the BJP in
both the Houses. The
CPI(M) opposed this
resolution on the ground that it contains no effective measure
that the
government will undertake in order to contain inflation. The CPI(M) members
moved concrete amendments
to this effect and pressed for
a vote in
both the Houses.
Such has been the
callous attitude of
the government of having only toothless discussions, on this
issue of price
rise which is eating into the vitals of the livelihood status of
the common
man.
In a similar vein, the
government
proposed that this winter session should begin with yet another
discussion on
price rise. This
was to be based on an eleven
page statement laid on the Table of both the Houses by the
finance minister. The
Left parties opposed this move on the
ground that this does not put any pressure on the government to
announce
tangible measures to tackle this runaway inflation. The CPI(M), therefore,
moved for a discussion
under Rules of parliamentary procedure that require a voting at
the
conclusion. The
pressure of a vote, it
was hoped, would make an obdurate government move towards
announcing some
concrete measures to tackle inflation and provide relief to the
people. Thus,
reflecting the agony of the vast masses
of Indian people and in order to force the government to take
tangible action,
the CPI(M) pressed for a discussion
under such Rules which led to the disruption of the
parliament for
a day.
The government’s obduracy had left no other course open.
The CPI(M) and the
Left have been
consistent advocates for the smooth and longer functioning of
the parliament. In
fact, the CPI(M), on the Floor of the House, proposed an
amendment to the constitution
making it mandatory for the parliament to sit
at least for a hundred days during a calendar year. This, we maintain, is
necessary to implement
our constitutional framework and spirit where the sovereignty of
the people is
exercised by making their elected members to the parliament
accountable to
them. This, in turn, requires the government of the day to be
accountable to
the parliament. This
can only be ensured
if the parliament functions properly and for adequate duration.
Despite this, the
CPI(M) had to
undertake this course in this winter session both to reflect the
concerns of
the aam admi and to
express
solidarity with them and share their agonies
that continue to mount due to this price rise.
A discussion under
Rules entailing
voting would have put pressure on the government to consider
accepting at least
three of the suggestions that the CPI(M) has put forward to
contain this price
rise. First, there
is a need to
immediately ban speculative trading in agricultural commodities,
particularly in
the forward/futures trading.
As
repeatedly argued in these columns earlier, such speculation
feeds the rise in
prices in an exponential manner.
The cumulative value
of trade,
according to figures released by the Forward Markets Commission,
for the period
April 1 to October 31, 2011 was Rs 106,36,960.76 crores. This went up from Rs
61,61,659.06 crores
during the same period last year. A phenomenal increase of 72.63
per cent. For the
same period, the cumulative value of
trade in agricultural commodities went up from Rs 7,06,214.23 to
Rs
10,83,495.03 crores. An
increase of
53.42 per cent. Such
a staggering growth
in speculative trading is a major contributor to the current
price rise. There
is, therefore, the need to immediately
ban, at least suspend, such trading in all agricultural
commodities. But
the government refuses to do this and
thus, facilitates super profits at the expense of the misery of
the people.
Secondly, there is a
need to rollback
at least the recent hikes in the prices of petroleum products. These have had a
cascading effect on the
overall inflation due to higher transportation costs. The argument that
these hikes have become
necessary because of the “losses” incurred by the oil companies
is a complete
fallacy. There are,
in reality, no
losses incurred by our major oil companies. The audited
financial results for
the year ending March 31, 2010 show that the Indian oil
company’s net profit
was Rs 10,998 crores. IOC had a reserve revenue surplus of Rs
49,472
crores! During
April-December 2009, the
other two public sector companies – Hindustan Petroleum
Corporation and Bharat
Petroleum Corporation – have earned profits of Rs 544 crores and
Rs 834 crores
respectively.
Further, the
government is reportedly
earning Rs 1,30,000 crores as revenue from taxes on petroleum
products, this
year. The total
amount of subsidy sanctioned
by the budget is only Rs 40,000 crores.
The government is making a profit of Rs 90,000 crores at
the expense of
the people!
Thirdly, the
government must
immediately distribute the stocks of foodgrains rotting in the
central godowns
to the states at BPL prices for distribution through the public
distribution
system. This will
ease the pressure on
the rise in the prices of food articles.
As of now, the foodgrains in the government godowns are
close to 600
lakh tones. This is nearly two and a half times more than the
required norm of
buffer stock. Yet, this UPA-II government refuses to undertake
this
measure.
Instead of undertaking
at least these
three measures, the finance minister’s statement labours on the
fact that
“there has been a steady improvement in the inflation situation
in India”
(SIC). Amongst the reasons that have been adduced such as global
developments
etc, the mismatch between demand and supply is particularly
highlighted.
Strangely, the finance minister speaks of “sustained high
economic growth in
recent past has led to improvements in purchasing power in both
rural and urban
areas”. This is
being said at a time
when the Planning Commission itself admits that the overall per
capita
consumption of cereals and pulses had fallen by 8 per cent in
rural areas and
3.3 per cent in urban areas.
Government
appointed commissions have reported that nearly 80 crores of our
people barely
survive on less than Rs 20 a
day. Surely,
either the government is blind, or,
it is deliberately misleading the nation to justify the
imposition of such
burdens on the people through this price rise.
The CPI(M), therefore,
reflecting the
concerns of the Indian people and seeking redressal from their
agonies will
press both inside and outside the parliament, through popular
struggles of the
people, to force the government to at least
implement these three measures, amongst others, to
contain this runaway
inflation.
(November 23, 2011)