People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXVI
No.
11 March 11, 2012 |
COAL
WAGE
AGREEMENT
A Charter
for Dignity and Self-Respect
Jibon Roy
THE All India
Coal Workers’ Federation (AICWF) well has the reason to
believe that the latest national coal wage agreement (NCWA) have
brought
sufficient amount of satisfaction to our coal workers. Its biggest
success has
been that it brings some hope to contract workers who are the weakest
section in
the industry and some relief to other workers regarding post-retirement
life.
SUBSTANTIAL
BENEFITS
As it stands
now, the agreement guarantees 25 per cent minimum benefit on
gross wages as on July 1, 2011, attracting consequential progressive
increases
in increment and other allowances like underground allowances,
attendance
bonus, special allowances etc. The agreement has ensured a further
guaranteed
benefit of 4 per cent on the new basic and this special allowance will
be applicable
to all coal workers. This benefit will also be extended to piece rate
workers. Accordingly,
the NCWA will provide a hike of 88 per cent in the basic and similar
increases
in all allowances which are paid in money form, such as allowances for
transport,
nursing and all kind of washing, thin seam and piece rate group
allowances etc.
House rent allowances will now be paid as percentages in lieu of lump
sums and the
rate will be 2 per cent. If all the consequential effects are taken
together,
including its impact over the life cover scheme, gratuity, provident
fund and promised
retiring benefits, the benefits from the agreement amount to more than
60 per
cent of the basics.
Thus this
settlement may set the pace for wage negotiations in all such
industries
where five years tenure of the last settlements have either expired or
are likely
to expire soon. But, most importantly, it has cleared all confusion in
the public
sector workers’ movement on the question of ‘periodicity’ of agreement.
One may
note that the movement stood divided on this issue during the course of
the
recent negotiation. Though the leaderships of major national trade
union
centres were originally in unanimity for some time, in the end all the
trade
union centres, except the CITU, got swayed by the deceptive notion that
a longer
tenure would mean better benefits. The way they finally accepted the
ten years’
periodicity in major public sector industries, reminded one of Lenin’s
perception
about trade unions being marred by spontaneity. In such a case, a trade
union
leadership often gets carried away by the vocal sections who basically
represent a backward and selfish consciousness. Now, even if the risks
associated
with a longer periodicity is ignored, a comparison of agreements with
two sets
of periodicity shows that a smaller tenure fetches more relief than an
agreement signed a ten years term. In the context of high inflation
rates and a
volatile polity, a longer duration agreement always carries more risks
for the
working class.
The coal
sector experience has been that if the minimum guaranteed
benefit is 24 per cent in the first five years, the next five years
would add 25
per cent over the gross, which would be 88 per cent over the emoluments
drawn at
the end of the preceding five years plus all the corollary accruals.
Moreover, to
calculate the real benefit, one has to add 4 per cent that would be
guaranteed for
all the workers as special pay.
WIDER
CONCERNS
Further, in
long term perspective, the NCWA has contributed to widening the
class unity. If the Indian trade union movement has to look beyond the
horizon and
come out of narrow rut of economism, the latest settlement is a modest
beginning. Most of the wage settlements so far were restricted mainly
to immediate
economic benefits for permanent workers, and despite repeated pleadings
by the CITU,
few trade unions showed interest in mobilising the permanent workers to
take up
the issues of contract workers. The result was that the latter did not
find any
prominence in the negotiations. However, the contract workers are not
something
outside the industry.
The coal
workers’ movement had hitherto failed to take up the issues
concerning the post-retirement benefits and other such issues. It is
hard to
believe that the trade union movement failing to create social
guarantee for the
education of average coal workers’ children, despite the fact that this
section
represents the most depressed and backward section of Indian workers in
the
organised sector of industries. One may note that while the industry
make fully
reimbursements in case of children getting higher and technical
education, it did
not make any reimbursement in case of those who studying up to XII
Standard. It
is in such a scenario that the latest agreement has fetched
post-retirement
benefits including medical allowance and improvements in the existing
rate of pension
as the third retirement benefit.
Since the
agreement has brought substantial reliefs to workers, some
sections of trade union leaders are trying to grab credit for the
negotiations.
But, to the AICWF, the basic reason behind the success is fact workers
were roused
with a sense of dignity, to which process the AICWF made its modest
contribution. Its role has not only raised the workers’ sense of
dignity, its class
orientation also brought them some substantial financial reliefs. It
was the
CITU-led AICWF that single-handedly organised the nationwide coal
strike of May
5, 2009, which initiated a process of consolidation and it culminated
in the total
strike of October 10, 2011 on bonus issue.
However, any
electrifying strike cannot take place in a massive industry
only on economic issues, unless the workers are adequately charged with
feelings
of dignity and self-respect. It is to the credit of the CITU that it
effectively injected this sense into the negotiation process.
SPECIFIC
CLAUSES
Looking at
the offer made on post-retirement benefits, one finds that the
new commitments will take the post-retirement benefits to around 30 per
cent, at
par with the executives’ emoluments.
Some of the
new provisions regarding social securities are as follows:
Section
9.1.0: The existing life cover scheme will continue but the
amount to be paid in addition to the normal gratuity shall be Rs
1,12,800,
applicable since February 1, 2012
Section
9.2.6: In addition to the compensation payable under the
Workmen’s Compensation Act, an ex gratia amount of Rs 84,600 will be
paid in
case of death or permanent disablement occurring on account of an
accident
arising out of and in course of employment.
Section
9.2.7: An amount of Rs 5 lakh will be paid to the next of kin of
any employee who dies due to a fatal mine accident.
The
provisions made for the post-retirement medical allowance and revival
of the existing pension fund are not ordinary either:
Section
13.8.0: A post-retirement medicare scheme for retired
non-executives and their spouses will be finalised by a committee on
the SAIL
pattern or otherwise within three months. It may be mentioned that this
is an
improvement over the decision taken in the first JBCCI meeting that
retirees
will be entitled to avail the facilities of a company’s hospital
facilities.
Section
13.9.0: An actuary has been appointed and after he submits his
report, a committee will examine it and make recommendation including
on the contribution
from both sides.
The way the
agreement has bound the employers to take a fair view on the
wages and social benefits, has its appeal beyond the coal sector, to
the entire
organised sector. The All India Coal Workers’ Federation is of the
opinion that
unless there is an improvement in the contract workers’ wages, the real
wage of
coal workers will continue declining in the same percentage as that of
the retiring
workers. The provision made for the contract workers is significant in
this context.
It is all the more important in view of the fact that at present more
than 50
per cent of the annual coal production takes place through contractors.
The recent
coal industry agreement is the first for a public sector company to
make positive
provisions on the matter of the contractor workers’ wages and service
conditions. A positive aspect is as follows:
Section
13.7.0: A high power committee would make recommendations on the
minimum wages and social security measures for contract workers engaged
in
mining operations by the contractor. In the last meeting the management
offered
Rs 367, Rs 387 and Rs 430 for the unskilled, skilled and highty skilled
workers
respectively on the basis of a mid-point formula. Now the issue will be
deliberated in the ensuing meeting and the recommendation sent to the
ministry
within three months.
However, it
would be an exaggerated expectation that by itself this provision
would end the agony of contractor workers, unless there is no
organisational
guarantee. The agreement will get fructified only when contract workers
are mobilised
and when powerful support for them from permanent workers is ensured.
Accomplishing
this task would be the greatest trial today for the AICWF leadership.
Apart from
setting the pace for ongoing and future negotiations in public
sector, this agreement has also challenged the creation of wage
differentials
through categorisation of workforce in BPE notifications and its
restructuring
in compartments --- a tactic that has attained some success. Also, it
has a
value for conducting a united campaign for common standard for
determination of
coal workers’ wages and fringe benefits, standardisation of existing
benefits,
and determination of differentials between the wages of executive and
non-executive on the one hand and between the wages of contract and
permanent workers
on the other.