People's Democracy(Weekly Organ of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) |
Vol. XXXVII
No. 14 April 07, 2013 |
RANGARAJAN REPORT ON NATURAL
GAS
Innovative
Exercise to Benefit Contractors Nishith
Chowdhury THE
pricing of natural gas has become an
issue of public debate after the exposure of the
government’s desperate bias
for the private players in the field. In fact the pricing
exercise for
domestically produced natural gas — the changeover from the
administrative price
mechanism to the so called “market price discovery regime”
in phases --- has
been a hectic exercise meant solely to benefit the
contractors handling this
crucial natural resource --- a veritable national asset ---
at the cost of
agriculture, power sector and common consumers. MANIPULATION GAME BY PRIVATE SECTOR As we know, the production and
marketing of gas in the Krishna Godavari
basin (KG Basin) started in 2009. Prior to this, natural gas
was priced through
the administrative price mechanism (APM), at the rate of
1.83 US dollars per
mmbtu (million
metric British thermal units), and the public sector Oil and
Natural Gas Commission (ONGC)
sold gas at this very price. But the entry of private sector
into the field of
natural gas production and distribution resulted in dual
pricing of gas --- (1)
administered and (2) market linked. The administered price
was determined
through the APM; it essentially was the cost of production
plus a reasonable
profit. However, for obvious reasons the
bench mark of reasonable profit
cannot be acceptable to private players like the Reliance
Industries Limited (RIL).
The RIL then successfully compelled the government to
constitute an empowered
group of ministers (EGOM) in 2007 to suggest a much higher
rate of natural gas.
In its turn, on September 12, 2007, this EGOM approved a
rate of 4.2 USD per
mmbtu, which was to be effective from April 1, 2009, as
against the ONGC rate
of only 1.83 USD. Astonishingly, in June 2004, the RIL
itself had offered a
price of 2.34 USD per mmbtu to the National Thermal Power
Corporation (NTPC),
a maharatna PSU, against international
competitive bidding and
the offer was for 17 years. In retrospect, this EGOM moved
with undue haste to fix the price
of natural gas at a level 79 per cent above what the RIL
itself offered to NTPC
in 2004 (USD 2.34), only to match the RIL’s subsequent
demand. This rate was
only symbolically
lower than that of 4.33 USD per mmbtu asked for by the RIL.
Further, as per the approval given
by the EGOM, this rate was to
be valid for five years and it might be extended after five
years. Thus, any
revision of rate is not due before April 2014. Despite
this validity date till
April 2014, however, Reliance in early 2012 demanded an
immediate premature increase
in the KG gas price in view
of an increase in gas price in the international market,
demanding that the KG
gas be hiked to USD 14.2 per mmbtu. What happened after that
is an open secret
--- the then union petroleum minister, S Jaipal Reddy,
stoutly resisted the
demand and paid the price for opposing the Reliance. Then, with effect from June 1,
2010, the government
revised the APM gas price in the country to 4.2 USD per
mmbtu (inclusive of
royalty), excepting in the North East, where the APM price
is 2.52 USD per
mmbtu. The latter price is 60 per cent of the APM price
elsewhere, and the
balance 40 per cent is being paid to nationalised oil
companies as subsidy from
the government budget. Thereafter
a committee was set up under the
chairmanship of Dr C Rangarajan, chairman of the Economic
Advisory Council to
the prime minister, to look into the production sharing
contract mechanism in
petroleum industry, including a formula for pricing of
domestic gas. The
committee was asked to submit its report by August 31, 2012.
Among other things,
the terms of reference of the committee included “structure
and elements of the
guidelines for determining the basis or formula for the
price of domestically
produced gas, and for monitoring actual price fixation.” The
report of the committee was submitted
to the government in December 2012 and was made available in
the public domain on
the website of the Economic Advisory Council in January this
year. In addition
to making a recommendation in favour of the production
sharing contract mechanism,
the committee also recommended a formula for the pricing of
domestic gas. STRATEGIC
IMPORTANCE The
crucial thing to bear in mind here is that
natural gas has the status of a strategic raw material and
energy source, and
therefore our approach to its pricing must be determined by
an understanding of
how this strategic raw material can help the nation meet its
principal
challenges in the years to come. As per the population
forecasts from the
United Nations, India will become the world’s most populous
nation in another
two decades. At present the per capita consumption of energy
and fertiliser in
our country continues to remain at a pitiably low level. The
deficit in
availability is huge --- both in fertilisers and power. All
policy formulations
and strategic decisions of the government must therefore be
aimed at ensuring the
availability of natural gas at an affordable price to the
fertiliser sector as
well as power sector in order to improve the quality of life
of our people in
the years to come. This
is important. The availability of food
across the nation is not satisfactory. More than 79 per cent
of the population
do not have the ability to spend even Rs 20 a day. As
regards energy, around 40 per cent of
the population is yet to gain access to electricity. The per
capita consumption
of power --- at around 750 units per annum --- is less than
one third of The
total installed capacity for power generation in the country
is 2,11,766.22 megawatt
(MW). Out of this, the generation through gas is 18,903.05
MW, which is only
8.92 per cent of the total generation. On the other hand, in
view of
environmental hazards of other modes of thermal generation
like through coal
etc, and also in view of limited reserves of coal, natural
gas is becoming a
preferred fuel for power generation and its demand is
increasing fast. Also,
besides the demand for natural gas in the fertiliser and power sectors, its
demands is also increasing in
the transport sector (as it is a non-pollutant fuel) and
also for city gas
distribution projects.
DEMAND-SUPPLY
POSITION
OF GAS On
the contrary, the indigenous
availability of natural gas is quite inadequate. There are
only a few producers
of gas whereas the number of consumers is increasing day by
day. There thus exists
a huge demand-supply gap even in the present scenario. The
12th Five Year Plan’s
estimate has suggested that a major proportion of growth in
demand is likely to
come from the power and fertiliser sectors. Its consumption
in power sector,
which is currently at 61 mmscmd (million metric standard
cubic metres per day)
is projected to increase to 207 mmscmd by 2016-17, while the
current
consumption of 37 mmscmd by the fertiliser sector is
projected to translate
into a demand of 106 mmscmd by 2014-15 and stay at that
level for some time thereafter.
The demand position for other sectors, where the current
level of consumption
is around 68 mmscmd, is likely to increase to 153 mmscmd by
2016-17.
Collectively, thus, the total demand is likely to grow from
166 mmscmd at
present to 466 mmscmd by 2016-17, with a compound annual
growth rate of 18.75
per cent. Table I alongside
presents the current demand
scenario in various sectors of the economy. TABLE I Sector-Wise
Demand of Gas during the 12th Five-Year Plan
(Figures in mmscmd) Sector 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Power 135 153 171 189 207 Fertiliser 55 61 106 106 106 Demand (Price elastic) – Sub-total 190 214 277 295 313 City Gas 15 19 24 39 46 Industrial 20 20 22 25 27 Petrochemicals/Refineries/ Internal consumption 54 61 67 72 72 Sponge Iron/Steel 7 8 8 8 8 Demand (Price inelastic) Sub-total 96 108 121 144 153 Total Demand 286 322 398 439 466 Source: www.eac.gov.in This
Table I must be viewed in conjunction with Table II given
alongside, in order
to have an idea of the significant demand-supply gap on the
basis of the gas
availability projections for the same period. TABLE II Total Projected
Gas Availability during the 12th Five-Year
Plan Period (Figures in mmscmd) Source 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Domestic Availability 124 149 170 177 209 Imports - LNG 63 87 87 129 150 Expected Total Availability 187 236 257 306 359 Source: www.eac.gov.in RANGARAJAN MANDATE & ITS REPERCUSSIONS Hopefully,
nobody would doubt that these
aspects should have been duly taken into consideration
before recommending any
formula for the pricing of domestic gas. However, what is in
store for all of
us in reality is beyond imagination. Having dealt with the
issue, the Rangarajan
committee report has recommended that the price of
domestically produced
natural gas must be determined as an average of the
international hub prices
and the cost of imported liquified natural gas (LNG), but
this would certainly have
an even more atrocious impact on the gas price than the
latest mechanism of the
so called “market discovery,” adopted by the EGOM in 2007,
can have. The panel
has, in its report that was made public early this year,
suggested that we must
first collected the market prices in the US, European and
Japanese hubs and
then take an average after including in it the netback price
of imported LNG, in
order to get the sale price of domestically produced gas.
Also, for supply
under the gas utilisation policy, the price thus determined
must apply equally
to all sectors regardless of their priority. The
possible consequences of implementation
of the formula, thus recommended, for the fertiliser sector
are as below: 1) It shall cause an
increase in price of domestic gas
by at least 4 to 4.5 USD per mmbtu of gas or more. 2) An increase of one
USD per mmbtu will increase the
total cost of production of urea, at present about 18
million tonnes, by more
than Rs 2300 crore. An increase of 4.25 USD per mmbtu
translates into an enhanced
cost of production of about Rs 5,500 per tonne of urea or
almost Rs 10,000
crore for 18 million tonnes of urea per annum. 3) The government of 4) Urea is at present
being sold to farmers at an MRP
of Rs 5,310 per tonne. In case the entire burden is passed
on to farmers, the
MRP would get doubled. Will the farmers, facing several
other problems already,
be able to bear an increase of more than 100 per cent in
retail price? 5) The enhanced retail
price shall dislocate the
entire fertiliser market. This would have a very adverse
impact on fertiliser
consumption which will result in reduced production of
foodgrains and other
agricultural crops. 6) The implementation
of the recommended formula will
have a disastrous effect on the energy sector also, causing
a very steep rise
in the unit cost of power generation. The
possible consequences of implementation
of the recommended formula on the power sector are as below:
1)
An increase of one USD per mmbtu will increase the total
cost of production by
Rs 4,350 per MW per annum. That is, for the present level of
generation of
18,903.05 MW through natural gas, the cost will rise by Rs
8.22 crore. 2)
An increase of 4.25 USD per mmbtu translates to enhanced
cost of production by
Rs 18,487.5 per MW. For the entire generation through gas as
on date, the cost
will be enhanced by about Rs 35 crore. All
this will cause a quantum jump in the power tariff to be
borne by general
consumers. We
are aware of the specific caution given
by the committee of secretaries, headed by the cabinet
secretary, in July 2007
that a delivery price beyond 5 USD per million unit will be
prohibitive for
fertiliser sector and that beyond 2.34 USD, for power
sector. But it appears
that the caution has completely been ignored. It has come
out in press that the
petroleum ministry has already given its approval to the
Rangarajan committee’s
recommendations. After the petroleum ministry, the finance
ministry too, in its
union budget 2013-14, has punched its stamp of approval on
the recommendation
for review of the existing gas prices. The RIL and other
private players have
already started celebrating the event, even though the
proposal is first to go
to the EGOM before it is approved by the union cabinet. CITU
general secretary Tapan
Sen has already written a strong letter to the prime
minister opposing the
disastrous move of the government that has got to be
stalled. Public opinion
against the government’s move is required to be generated in
order to ensure
food security, fertiliser security and energy security in
the country.